Fantasy Football TE SFB Draft Rankings
| # | Player | TM | BYE | FF Pts | ADP12 | ADP10 | ↑↓ | GC | DIF | Rec | RecYdsReceiving | RecTD | Rec1D | RuAtt | RuYdsRushing | RuTD | Ru1D | Fum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trey McBride
Draft Note
McBride's 2025 campaign was about as dominant as a tight end season gets. He finished as the overall TE1 for the second consecutive year at 15.2 points per game—up from 11.9 per game in 2024—with 126 receptions, 1,239 yards, and 11 touchdowns on 163 targets. The underlying metrics back up every bit of it. McBride ranked in the 93rd percentile in PFF pass route grade and 88th in yards per route run (1.78 YPRR) among tight ends with meaningful playing time. He ran 62.8 percent of his routes from the slot—95th percentile—which explains the volume; he's a mismatch nightmare in the middle of the field. His ESPN OVERALL score (86th percentile) confirms the production, even if his OPEN score (45th percentile) suggests he's not consistently beating coverage so much as leveraging his positioning and Jacoby Brissett's trust to generate catches. He also did damage with the ball in his hands, avoiding tackles at an 88th percentile rate. The one area that doesn't pop is YAC per reception (50th percentile), but with 126 catches, he doesn't need to be a run-after-catch threat to dominate fantasy. He's going as a top-two tight end and has every metric to justify being the consensus TE1.
| ARI | 14 | 334 | 2.11 | 3.03 | 39 | 38 | 88 | 862 | 7.5 | 47.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2 | Brock Bowers
Draft Note
Bowers has the tools to be the best tight end in fantasy football. He finished TE2 in 2024 and TE4 on a per-game basis in 2025 despite missing five games. His 12.0 points per game over those 12 games were essentially identical to his rookie production. The underlying metrics are elite: 88th percentile PFF pass route grade among tight ends, 81st percentile in YPRR (1.70), and a 72nd percentile contested catch rate that reflects his physicality when the ball is in the air. His ESPN OVERALL score (89th percentile) is among the best in the sample. The limitation has always been team context. The Raiders are one of the worst offensive environments in the league, i.e. fewer touchdowns scored, and Bowers has had to absorb that drag on his production. He's going as the consensus TE1, likely due to the belief that Fernando Mendoza will turn the Raiders’ offense around.
| LV | 13 | 306 | 2.05 | 2.07 | 34 | 32 | 74 | 874 | 6.5 | 45.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 3 | Tyler Warren
Draft Note
Warren's rookie numbers present an interesting puzzle. He finished TE7 overall in his first NFL season but only TE11 on a per-game basis at 9.1 points per game, and his ESPN receiver scores were near the bottom of the tight end sample—9th percentile in OPEN score and 8th percentile OVERALL—suggesting he struggled to consistently create separation against NFL coverage. At the same time, his PFF metrics told a different story: 75th percentile in YPRR and an 88th percentile YAC per reception, indicating that when he did get the ball, he did real damage. The 68th percentile route grade for a rookie is respectable and suggests the foundation is there for improvement. He also runs a high percentage of routes from the slot (68th percentile), which helps. The disconnect between the ESPN and the PFF productivity metrics isn't unusual for a rookie TE learning to navigate NFL coverage—the YPRR and YAC numbers suggest the tools are real.
| IND | 13 | 299 | 5.05 | 6.03 | 71 | 68 | 81 | 815 | 3.5 | 44.5 | 8 | 11 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1 | |
| 4 | Colston Loveland
Draft Note
Loveland's rookie season is a case study in talent that took a while to show up on the field. He finished TE14 overall and TE18 per game at 7.7 points per game, but his underlying metrics rank among the elite at the position. His PFF pass route grade (97th percentile) and YPRR (1.86, 92nd percentile) are both near the top of the tight end sample, and his ESPN OPEN score (68th percentile) suggests he’s able to shed coverage consistently. There’s a long list of tight ends who have broken out in their sophomore year, and the signs are there. From Week 9 on, he was the overall TE2 behind Trey McBride. He's currently going as the third tight end off the board, and the market is essentially pricing in a breakout that appears to have already begun.
| CHI | 10 | 292 | 4.04 | 4.10 | 56 | 52 | 68 | 841 | 6.9 | 43.2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 5 | Tucker Kraft
Draft Note
Kraft was one of my favorite middle-round values last year and if his ADP lingers in the sixth or seventh round this season, he’s going to be my primary target at the position. The ACL tear that ended his season in Week 9 may have obscured one of the most impressive statistical profiles at the tight end position. In seven games before the injury, he averaged 14.0 points per game—the overall TE1 on a per-game basis—and was playing at a 73-catch, 1139-yard, 14.6-touchdown pace. The PFF metrics were historic for a player in just his second full year: 99th percentile in YPRR (2.33) and 100th percentile in YAC per reception (10.8) among tight ends. His 90th percentile route grade suggests this wasn't a small-sample fluke—he was creating separation and turning targets into big plays at an elite rate. His ESPN OVERALL score (89th percentile) and the 86th-percentile avoided tackle rate further reinforce the profile. Kraft is on track to return for Week 1, but at a seventh-round ADP, the value is significant if he comes back near full health. You're getting a player who was producing at a TE1 per-game pace before the injury for a fraction of the price of the tier above him.
| GB | 11 | 273 | 7.01 | 8.03 | 86 | 81 | 56 | 832 | 7.5 | 40.6 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 6 | Sam LaPorta
Draft Note
LaPorta's underlying metrics in 2025 were some of the best in the tight end sample despite playing just nine games—his 93rd-percentile YPRR (2.00), 92nd-percentile route grade, and 90th-percentile YAC per reception all reflect a player operating at a high level when healthy. He caught every contested target thrown his way and didn't drop a single pass. The per-game production tells the same story. He was theTE7 on a per-game basis in both 2024 and 2025, at 9.0 and 9.7 points respectively. The Lions' spread-it-around offense limits how high his ceiling goes. Detroit leans heavily on Amon-Ra St. Brown, Jahmyr Gibbs, and the rushing game, which means LaPorta operates in an environment where targets are shared and touchdowns are the primary path to big weeks. He's going as the TE7, and the value proposition is a player who has been quietly elite from a per-game standpoint in limited action and should be fully healthy entering the season. LaPorta is a midrange TE1 with enough upside to function as a weekly starter when the Lions give him opportunities in the red zone.
| DET | 6 | 269 | 7.12 | 9.04 | 101 | 95 | 68 | 811 | 3.9 | 42.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 7 | Harold Fannin
Draft Note
Fannin's rookie season was one of the more quietly impressive debuts at the position—he finished TE5 overall in 16 games while playing for one of the least functional offenses in the league. He caught 72 of 103 targets for 731 yards and six touchdowns, and his PFF pass route grade (80th percentile) and YPRR (1.68, 78th percentile) both suggest he was doing real work as a route runner despite playing through significant QB instability. The standout metric is his avoided tackle rate—0.31 per reception, 97th percentile among tight ends—meaning Fannin is a legitimate YAC weapon who can turn short throws into meaningful gains even when the quarterback can't push the ball downfield. The issue with his profile is the ESPN receiver scores. His OPEN score (16th percentile) and OVERALL score (22nd percentile) suggest he isn't consistently winning clean against coverage. He compensates through YAC rather than pure separation. David Njoku's departure makes Fannin an every-down player, and a Browns team expected to trail most weeks means the volume should be there. The quarterback situation is the entire ceiling question. Shedeur Sanders, Deshaun Watson, and Dillon Gabriel are vying for the starting job, with Sanders in the pole position. The good news there is that Fannin’s numbers–4.7 catches for 52 yards and 0.67 touchdowns–were much better with Sanders at quarterback. Fannin should develop into an every-week weapon if the quarterback situation settles. He's going as a top-six tight end, and that price is defensible on volume alone. Whether he's an elite TE1 or a target-share mirage depends almost entirely on the passer.
| CLE | 11 | 269 | 7.07 | 8.09 | 93 | 86 | 61 | 732 | 5.3 | 38.0 | 11 | 21 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1 | |
| 8 | Kyle Pitts
Draft Note
Pitts finally delivered on a fraction of his draft pedigree in 2025, finishing as the overall TE2 with 88 receptions, 928 yards, and five touchdowns on 114 targets. The PFF metrics confirm the underlying talent is real: 86th-percentile route grade and 83rd-percentile YPRR among qualified tight ends. The ESPN receiver scores tell a more nuanced story—49th percentile in OPEN, 71st percentile OVERALL—suggesting that Pitts wins through size and athleticism rather than pure separation, which aligns with the trajectory of his career. The concern is the volatility that shadowed him even in a TE2 season: only six of 16 games went over 10 points, and five went under five. Both Bijan Robinson and Drake London will continue to act as a volume ceiling. In fact, Pitts’s scoring output doubled in the five games that London missed (7.4 vs. 15.5). Pitts is going as the TE7, which reflects the 2025 output without fully pricing in the inconsistency. He's a legitimate every-week starter who will frustrate you in the weeks when the touchdowns don't come.
| ATL | 11 | 255 | 7.08 | 8.10 | 100 | 92 | 69 | 701 | 4.2 | 38.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 9 | Travis Kelce
Draft Note
Kelce remains one of the most reliable tight ends in the league, which is a strange thing to say about a 36-year-old, but the numbers keep showing up. He's finished TE4 and TE6 the last two seasons–TE7 and TE8 on a per-game basis–while playing 33 of 34 games. His ESPN OPEN score (87th percentile) says he's still getting free in coverage, his PFF route grade (73rd percentile) is strong, and the YAC (72nd percentile) shows he's still functional as a run-after-catch option. The Chiefs' offense has evolved, with Rashee Rice healthy, Xavier Worthy as a genuine vertical threat, and Kenneth Walker replacing Isiah Pacheco at running back. Whether Kelce retains the same volume in a more balanced attack is the open question. He's going as the TE12, and two straight years of TE7-8 per game production for a player available in the double-digit rounds is reasonable value even if the ceiling is limited at this point in his career.
| KC | 5 | 246 | 9.12 | 11.08 | 116 | 107 | 64 | 693 | 4.3 | 36.9 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 10 | George Kittle
Draft Note
When Kittle is healthy, there's an argument he's the most complete tight end in the game. His ESPN OVERALL score (100th percentile) and PFF pass route grade (100th percentile) were both the best in the entire TE sample last season—and this was in only 10 games before a torn Achilles ended his year. In those 10 games, he averaged 12.8 points per game, TE2 on a per-game basis. In 2024, he was the overall TE1 at 13.9 per game over 14 games. His YPRR (2.15, 95th percentile) and his contested catch rate (84.6%, 92nd percentile) confirm that he's an elite route runner and a physical mismatch when the ball is in the air. The 49ers added Mike Evans and Christian Kirk to replace Jauan Jennings, and Brock Purdy's 98th percentile CPOE should give us plenty of confidence that Kittle will continue to receive quality targets. The torn Achilles recovery is the entire story. He could miss the start of the season, and the timeline matters enormously at his current TE10 ADP—a price that gives you significant upside if he plays 13-plus games and a frustrating experience if he misses the first month and/or the injury lingers deep into the season. Draft him knowing you'll need a streaming plan for the early weeks, and that you're paying a discounted price on one of the best players at the position when he's right. And he might be right by the fantasy playoffs.
| SF | 8 | 243 | 9.08 | 11.04 | 120 | 110 | 54 | 707 | 6.2 | 35.8 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Who has the best SFB14 rankings?
4for4 has proven highly consistent in both their rankings, which is paramount for success in fantasy football. John Paulsen, 4for4’s Director of Forecasting was named the Most Accurate Fantasy Football Expert by FantasyPros in both 2010 and 2014 and was the runner-up in 2011 and 2019. In 2012, 2015, 2017, and 2020 he finished among the top four rankers.
The forecasting process at 4for4 places emphasis on teams’ offensive tendencies, strength of schedule, and athlete talent via predictive modeling. This allows the SFB14 rankings to effectively deliver fantasy football results that are measurable, objective, and consistently replicated, and 4for4’s historical success in accuracy confirms that they’re good at what they do.
What is the best draft position in SFB14 drafts?
There is an argument for all three parts of the draft in SFB14 as the top few picks are guaranteed an elite QB in this superflex format. In the middle of the draft you are in a good spot to not miss out on any crazy runs, and if you select at the end of the draft order, drafters can take advantage of the third-round reversal and get three picks within the first 25 players.
What is the best draft strategy in SFB14 drafts?
With the scoring as crazy as it is, there is no best strategy for SFB14. In a tournament of this size, being different helps so try to think outside of the box when drafting.
What is SFB14 ADP?
ADP, or Average Draft Position,indicates the average spot where players are being selected in drafts. Tracking SFB14 ADP helps you anticipate when players will be available and strategize your picks effectively, maximizing value.
Who has the most accurate SFB14 rankings?
Look no further than 4for4's proven track record of fantasy football accuracy. FantasyPros recognized 4for4’s Director of Forecasting, John Paulsen, as the Most Accurate Fantasy Football Expert in both 2010 and 2014, with runner-up finishes in 2011 and 2019. In 2012, 2015, 2017, and 2020 he also finished inside the top four.
4for4's forecasting uses a data-driven model that considers offensive schemes, upcoming matchups, and player talent. This translates to rankings you can trust, built on measurable data and objective analysis. Their historical success speaks for itself - 4for4 is the resource you need to dominate SFB14.
What is the best first-round pick in SFB14 Drafts?
There is no right answer here, as it depends on your specific strategy going into the SFB14 draft. It is a Superflex format with an emphasis on the rushing quarterback, so if you would like to have an elite quarterback, then select Josh Allen, Jalen Hurts, or Lamar Jackson. Only one RB needs to start in 2024, so grabbing a top rusher like Christian McCaffrey or Breece Hall could be the way to get out to a solid start. The scoring is also TE premium, so taking Travis Kelce or Sam LaPorta may also serve you well.
Fantasy Football Draft Rankings by Position
- Fantasy Football Standard Draft Rankings - the latest fantasy football draft rankings.
- Standard QB Draft Rankings: Check out the latest draft rankings for quarterbacks.
- Standard RB Draft Rankings: See the draft rankings for running backs.
- Standard WR Draft Rankings: Discover the draft rankings for wide receivers.
- Standard TE Draft Rankings: Explore the latest draft rankings for tight ends.
- Standard Kicker Draft Rankings: Get the latest rankings for kickers.
- Standard Defense Draft Rankings: Review the latest draft rankings for defenses.
Fantasy Football Cheatsheets by League
- Best Ball Draft Rankings: Explore the top Best Ball draft rankings.
- Drafters Draft Rankings: Check the Drafters platform's draft rankings.
- CBS Draft Rankings: Discover CBS's draft rankings.
- DraftKings Draft Rankings: View DraftKings' draft rankings.
- ESPN Draft Rankings: Get ESPN's draft rankings.
- FanDuel Draft Rankings: Find FanDuel's draft rankings.
- FFPC Draft Rankings: See the FFPC's draft rankings.
- SBFFC Draft Rankings: Review SBFFC's draft rankings.
- SFB Draft Rankings: Explore SFB's draft rankings.
- Sleeper Draft Rankings: Check out the Sleeper's draft rankings.
- Underdog Draft Rankings: View Underdog's draft rankings.
- Yahoo Draft Rankings: Discover Yahoo's draft rankings.
M/U = 4for4 matchup ranking (Schedule-Adjusted Fantasy Points Allowed). 1 = Worst Matchup, 32 = Best Matchup







