![Zay Flowers](https://www.4for4.com/sites/default/files/styles/profile_photo_148x148/public/ff_players_photo/zay_flowers_flowez1.png?itok=-xhyK7rd&v=147)
Draft Note by John Paulsen
As a rookie, Zay Flowers was the fantasy WR27 but was the WR34 on a per-game basis. The Ravens let Odell Beckham walk, and didn’t really replace him, so the team is likely to have Flowers, Rashod Bateman and Nelson Agholor as its top three receivers. Flowers should see plenty of targets and become a more consistent weapon in his second season.
Zay Flowers
- WR
- , Baltimore Ravens
- 24
- 172 lbs
- 5' 10"
- 54
- 1
Full Season Projection
- Full Season Projection
- Dfs Projection
Draft note
As a rookie, Zay Flowers was the fantasy WR27 but was the WR34 on a per-game basis. The Ravens let Odell Beckham walk, and didn’t really replace him, so the team is likely to have Flowers, Rashod Bateman and Nelson Agholor as its top three receivers. Flowers should see plenty of targets and become a more consistent weapon in his second season.
Latest news
![Zay Flowers](https://www.4for4.com/sites/default/files/styles/content_item_64x64/public/ff_players_photo/zay_flowers_flowez1.png?itok=Qg7D7_SR&v=147)
Scouting report
2024 Strength of Schedule - BAL
W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | W5 | W6 | W7 | W8 | W9 | W10 | W11 | W12 | W13 | W14 | W15 | W16 | W17 | W18 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 @KC | 19 LV | 7 @DAL | 6 BUF | 26 @CIN | 29 WAS | 27 @TB | 18 @CLE | 5 DEN | 26 CIN | 10 @PIT | 31 @LAC | 28 PHI | BYE | 21 @NYG | 10 PIT | 30 @HOU | 18 CLE |
Schedule difficulty based on schedule-adjusted, positional defensive ranking. Top DEF = 1, bottom DEF = 32.
Game Stats
Week | Opp | Rec | RecYds | RecTD | Tgts | YPR | RuAtt | RuYds | RuTD | Fum | YPC | STD | 0.5 PPR | PPR | Snaps | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | HOU | 9 | 78 | 0 | 10 | 8.67 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 4.50 | 8.7 | 13.20 | 17.7 | 54/64 | 84.4% |
2 | @CIN | 4 | 62 | 0 | 5 | 15.50 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6.00 | 6.8 | 8.80 | 10.8 | 58/75 | 77.3% |
3 | IND | 8 | 48 | 0 | 10 | 6.00 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 5.0 | 9.00 | 13.0 | 67/72 | 93.1% |
4 | @CLE | 3 | 56 | 0 | 4 | 18.67 | 1 | -6 | 0 | 0 | -6.00 | 5.0 | 6.50 | 8.0 | 57/58 | 98.3% |
5 | @PIT | 5 | 73 | 0 | 11 | 14.60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 7.3 | 9.80 | 12.3 | 69/70 | 98.6% |
6 | @TEN | 6 | 50 | 1 | 8 | 8.33 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 11.1 | 14.10 | 17.1 | 63/71 | 88.7% |
7 | DET | 4 | 75 | 0 | 6 | 18.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 7.5 | 9.50 | 11.5 | 43/60 | 71.7% |
8 | @ARI | 5 | 19 | 0 | 7 | 3.80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.9 | 4.40 | 6.9 | 49/65 | 75.4% |
9 | SEA | 1 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 11.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.1 | 1.60 | 2.1 | 52/76 | 68.4% |
10 | CLE | 5 | 73 | 0 | 6 | 14.60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 7.3 | 9.80 | 12.3 | 47/54 | 87.0% |
11 | CIN | 3 | 43 | 0 | 4 | 14.33 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7.00 | 5.0 | 6.50 | 8.0 | 65/66 | 98.5% |
12 | @LAC | 5 | 25 | 1 | 8 | 5.00 | 1 | 37 | 1 | 0 | 37.00 | 18.2 | 20.70 | 23.2 | 67/71 | 94.4% |
13 | BYE | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
14 | LAR | 6 | 60 | 1 | 10 | 10.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 14.0 | 17.00 | 20.0 | 70/72 | 97.2% |
15 | @JAX | 1 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 7.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.7 | 1.20 | 1.7 | 59/70 | 84.3% |
16 | @SF | 9 | 72 | 1 | 13 | 8.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 13.2 | 17.70 | 22.2 | 53/68 | 77.9% |
P
Injury Details (w17)
Status: Probable Injury: Calf | MIA | 3 | 106 | 1 | 3 | 35.33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 16.6 | 18.10 | 19.6 | 32/57 | 56.1% |
O
Injury Details (w18)
Status: Out Injury: Calf | PIT | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Per game | 4.81 | 53.63 | 0.31 | 6.75 | 11.14 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 0.06 | 0 | 7.00 | 8.09 | 10.49 | 12.90 | 56.56/66.81 | 84.46% | |
Totals | 77 | 858 | 5 | 108 | 11.14 | 8 | 56 | 1 | 0 | 7.00 | 129.4 | 167.9 | 206.4 | 905/1069 | 84.46% |