
Draft Note by John Paulsen
Andrews got off to a painfully slow start in 2024, likely due in part to a preseason car accident that may have lingered into the regular season. Through four weeks, he managed just six catches for 65 yards on nine total targets. But once the season got rolling, so did Andrews. From Week 5 on, he played at a 64-catch, 795-yard, and 14.4-touchdown pace and finished as the fantasy TE5 during that stretch—even while playing just 63% of the snaps and averaging the 20th-most targets per game. That production speaks to his elite red-zone usage and chemistry with Lamar Jackson, but there are red flags. Isaiah Likely continues to push for a larger role, and head coach John Harbaugh publicly challenged Likely to “be an All-Pro” in 2025—something that may not coexist with a high-end fantasy season for Andrews. He turns 30 in September, but tight ends tend to age well, and the fact that Andrews was sixth in yards per route run speaks to his continued production. (Though he was 41st of 44 eligible tight ends in YAC/rec, another red flag.) He remains a strong bet for low-end TE1 numbers with week-winning upside if the touchdowns hold.
Mark Andrews
- TE
- , Baltimore Ravens
- 30
- 250 lbs
- 6' 5"
- Oklahoma
- 81
- 1
Full Season Projection
- Full Season Projection
- Dfs Projection
Draft note
Andrews got off to a painfully slow start in 2024, likely due in part to a preseason car accident that may have lingered into the regular season. Through four weeks, he managed just six catches for 65 yards on nine total targets. But once the season got rolling, so did Andrews. From Week 5 on, he played at a 64-catch, 795-yard, and 14.4-touchdown pace and finished as the fantasy TE5 during that stretch—even while playing just 63% of the snaps and averaging the 20th-most targets per game. That production speaks to his elite red-zone usage and chemistry with Lamar Jackson, but there are red flags. Isaiah Likely continues to push for a larger role, and head coach John Harbaugh publicly challenged Likely to “be an All-Pro” in 2025—something that may not coexist with a high-end fantasy season for Andrews. He turns 30 in September, but tight ends tend to age well, and the fact that Andrews was sixth in yards per route run speaks to his continued production. (Though he was 41st of 44 eligible tight ends in YAC/rec, another red flag.) He remains a strong bet for low-end TE1 numbers with week-winning upside if the touchdowns hold.
Latest news

Scouting report
2025 Strength of Schedule - BAL
W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | W5 | W6 | W7 | W8 | W9 | W10 | W11 | W12 | W13 | W14 | W15 | W16 | W17 | W18 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12 @BUF | 15 CLE | 5 DET | 28 @KC | 13 HOU | 21 LAR | BYE | 24 CHI | 19 @MIA | 20 @MIN | 15 @CLE | 7 NYJ | 30 CIN | 25 PIT | 30 @CIN | 22 NE | 23 @GB | 25 @PIT |
Schedule difficulty based on schedule-adjusted, positional defensive ranking. Top DEF = 1, bottom DEF = 32.
Game Stats
Week | Opp | Rec | RecYds | RecTD | Tgts | YPR | RuAtt | RuYds | RuTD | Fum | YPC | STD | 0.5 PPR | PPR | Snaps | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | @KC | 2 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 7.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.4 | 2.40 | 3.4 | 59/80 | 73.8% |
2 | LV | 4 | 51 | 0 | 5 | 12.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 5.1 | 7.10 | 9.1 | 41/65 | 63.1% |
3 | @DAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 21/63 | 33.3% |
4 | BUF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 26/57 | 45.6% |
5 | @CIN | 4 | 55 | 0 | 5 | 13.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 5.5 | 7.50 | 9.5 | 43/78 | 55.1% |
6 | WAS | 3 | 66 | 1 | 4 | 22.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 12.6 | 14.10 | 15.6 | 34/68 | 50.0% |
7 | @TB | 4 | 41 | 2 | 4 | 10.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 16.1 | 18.10 | 20.1 | 32/59 | 54.2% |
8 | @CLE | 5 | 36 | 1 | 5 | 7.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 9.6 | 12.10 | 14.6 | 50/68 | 73.5% |
9 | DEN | 2 | 26 | 0 | 2 | 13.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.6 | 3.60 | 4.6 | 28/57 | 49.1% |
10 | CIN | 6 | 68 | 1 | 7 | 11.33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 12.8 | 15.80 | 18.8 | 55/63 | 87.3% |
11 | @PIT | 2 | 22 | 0 | 3 | 11.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.2 | 3.20 | 4.2 | 37/61 | 60.7% |
12 | @LAC | 5 | 44 | 1 | 5 | 8.80 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 10.6 | 13.10 | 15.6 | 27/65 | 41.5% |
13 | PHI | 6 | 67 | 1 | 7 | 11.17 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 12.9 | 15.90 | 18.9 | 53/72 | 73.6% |
14 | BYE | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
15 | @NYG | 2 | 24 | 1 | 2 | 12.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 8.4 | 9.40 | 10.4 | 39/59 | 66.1% |
16 | PIT | 4 | 37 | 1 | 6 | 9.25 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 9.8 | 11.80 | 13.8 | 47/62 | 75.8% |
17 | @HOU | 2 | 68 | 1 | 2 | 34.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 12.8 | 13.80 | 14.8 | 35/63 | 55.6% |
18 | CLE | 4 | 54 | 1 | 8 | 13.50 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 11.4 | 13.40 | 15.4 | 55/70 | 78.6% |
Per game | 3.24 | 39.59 | 0.65 | 4.06 | 12.24 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0 | 0 | 1.25 | 7.87 | 9.49 | 11.11 | 40.12/65.29 | 61.00% | |
Totals | 55 | 673 | 11 | 69 | 12.24 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1.25 | 133.8 | 161.3 | 188.8 | 682/1110 | 61.00% |