Draft Note by John Paulsen
He finished TE8 in his second season and is primed for another leap in production if he can earn a larger role in the offense. But that’s the problem with drafting Packer receivers–Matt LaFleur and Jordan Love spread the ball around so much it’s tough to count on anyone in a given week. But Kraft led the position in yards after contact and broken tackles per catch, so he’s got the talent to join the top 5. He should finish TE8 again at a minimum, barring injury. LaFleur agrees, saying, “if there’s an area we gotta do a better job on, I would say featuring the tight end.”
Tucker Kraft
- TE
- , Green Bay Packers
- 25
- 259 lbs
- 6' 5"
- South Dakota State
- 101
- 1
Full Season Projection
- Full Season Projection
- Dfs Projection
Draft note
He finished TE8 in his second season and is primed for another leap in production if he can earn a larger role in the offense. But that’s the problem with drafting Packer receivers–Matt LaFleur and Jordan Love spread the ball around so much it’s tough to count on anyone in a given week. But Kraft led the position in yards after contact and broken tackles per catch, so he’s got the talent to join the top 5. He should finish TE8 again at a minimum, barring injury. LaFleur agrees, saying, “if there’s an area we gotta do a better job on, I would say featuring the tight end.”
Latest news
Scouting report
2025 Strength of Schedule - GB
| W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | W5 | W6 | W7 | W8 | W9 | W10 | W11 | W12 | W13 | W14 | W15 | W16 | W17 | W18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 DET | 14 WAS | 15 @CLE | 6 @DAL | BYE | 30 CIN | 9 @ARI | 25 @PIT | 31 CAR | 3 PHI | 2 @NYG | 20 MIN | 5 @DET | 24 CHI | 10 @DEN | 24 @CHI | 17 BAL | 20 @MIN |
Schedule difficulty based on schedule-adjusted, positional defensive ranking. Top DEF = 1, bottom DEF = 32.
Game Stats
| Week | Opp | Rec | RecYds | RecTD | Tgts | YPR | RuAtt | RuYds | RuTD | Fum | YPC | STD | 0.5 PPR | PPR | Snaps | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @PHI | 2 | 37 | 0 | 3 | 18.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 3.7 | 4.70 | 5.7 | 64/67 | 95.5% |
| 2 | IND | 2 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 8.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.6 | 2.60 | 3.6 | 56/70 | 80.0% |
| 3 | @TEN | 2 | 24 | 0 | 3 | 12.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.4 | 3.40 | 4.4 | 42/63 | 66.7% |
| 4 | MIN | 6 | 53 | 1 | 9 | 8.83 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 11.3 | 14.30 | 17.3 | 65/76 | 85.5% |
| 5 | @LAR | 4 | 88 | 2 | 5 | 22.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 20.8 | 22.80 | 24.8 | 50/59 | 84.7% |
| 6 | ARI | 2 | 13 | 0 | 4 | 6.50 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 1.5 | 2.50 | 3.5 | 60/73 | 82.2% |
| 7 | HOU | 3 | 33 | 1 | 4 | 11.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 9.3 | 10.80 | 12.3 | 55/58 | 94.8% |
| 8 | @JAX | 3 | 78 | 1 | 3 | 26.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 13.8 | 15.30 | 16.8 | 59/70 | 84.3% |
| 9 | DET | 4 | 34 | 0 | 6 | 8.50 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 3.6 | 5.60 | 7.6 | 65/65 | 100.0% |
| 10 | BYE | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | @CHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 43/46 | 93.5% |
| 12 | SF | 2 | 26 | 1 | 2 | 13.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 8.6 | 9.60 | 10.6 | 57/72 | 79.2% |
| 13 | MIA | 6 | 78 | 0 | 7 | 13.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 7.8 | 10.80 | 13.8 | 49/54 | 90.7% |
| 14 | @DET | 3 | 41 | 1 | 5 | 13.67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 10.1 | 11.60 | 13.1 | 44/50 | 88.0% |
| 15 | @SEA | 2 | 34 | 0 | 2 | 17.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 3.4 | 4.40 | 5.4 | 57/64 | 89.1% |
| 16 | NO | 3 | 63 | 0 | 4 | 21.00 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 6.5 | 8.00 | 9.5 | 43/69 | 62.3% |
| 17 | @MIN | 2 | 53 | 0 | 3 | 26.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 5.3 | 6.30 | 7.3 | 54/63 | 85.7% |
| 18 | CHI | 4 | 36 | 0 | 7 | 9.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 3.6 | 5.60 | 7.6 | 62/65 | 95.4% |
| Per game | 2.94 | 41.59 | 0.41 | 4.12 | 14.14 | 0.18 | 0.35 | 0 | 0.06 | 2.00 | 6.66 | 8.14 | 9.61 | 54.41/63.76 | 85.74% | |
| Totals | 50 | 707 | 7 | 70 | 14.14 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2.00 | 113.3 | 138.3 | 163.3 | 925/1084 | 85.74% | |
