
Draft Note by John Paulsen
Ertz surprisingly finished as the TE9 in his 12th NFL season, posting the most yards (654) and receptions (66) since 2021, and the most touchdowns (7) since 2018. Well past his prime, Ertz proved to be a serviceable baseline option at the position. Tight ends tend to age better than running backs or receivers, so it’s not inconceivable that Ertz has another low-end TE1 season provided he can stay relatively healthy.
Zach Ertz
- TE
- , Washington Commanders
- 35
- 250 lbs
- 6' 5"
- Stanford
- 155
- 1
Full Season Projection
- Full Season Projection
- Dfs Projection
Draft note
Ertz surprisingly finished as the TE9 in his 12th NFL season, posting the most yards (654) and receptions (66) since 2021, and the most touchdowns (7) since 2018. Well past his prime, Ertz proved to be a serviceable baseline option at the position. Tight ends tend to age better than running backs or receivers, so it’s not inconceivable that Ertz has another low-end TE1 season provided he can stay relatively healthy.
Latest news

Scouting report
2025 Strength of Schedule - WAS
W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | W5 | W6 | W7 | W8 | W9 | W10 | W11 | W12 | W13 | W14 | W15 | W16 | W17 | W18 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 NYG | 23 @GB | 27 LV | 16 @ATL | 1 @LAC | 24 CHI | 6 @DAL | 28 @KC | 11 SEA | 5 DET | 19 @MIA | BYE | 10 DEN | 20 @MIN | 2 @NYG | 3 PHI | 6 DAL | 3 @PHI |
Schedule difficulty based on schedule-adjusted, positional defensive ranking. Top DEF = 1, bottom DEF = 32.
Game Stats
Week | Opp | Rec | RecYds | RecTD | Tgts | YPR | RuAtt | RuYds | RuTD | Fum | YPC | STD | 0.5 PPR | PPR | Snaps | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | @TB | 3 | 28 | 0 | 4 | 9.33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.8 | 4.30 | 5.8 | 42/59 | 71.2% |
2 | NYG | 4 | 62 | 0 | 4 | 15.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 6.2 | 8.20 | 10.2 | 47/72 | 65.3% |
3 | @CIN | 5 | 38 | 0 | 5 | 7.60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 3.8 | 6.30 | 8.8 | 38/59 | 64.4% |
4 | @ARI | 3 | 22 | 0 | 3 | 7.33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 4.2 | 5.70 | 7.2 | 49/72 | 68.1% |
5 | CLE | 2 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 5.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.0 | 2.00 | 3.0 | 38/67 | 56.7% |
6 | @BAL | 4 | 68 | 0 | 5 | 17.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 6.8 | 8.80 | 10.8 | 47/59 | 79.7% |
7 | CAR | 4 | 40 | 1 | 5 | 10.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 10.0 | 12.00 | 14.0 | 40/69 | 58.0% |
8 | CHI | 7 | 77 | 0 | 11 | 11.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 7.7 | 11.20 | 14.7 | 56/74 | 75.7% |
9 | @NYG | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.5 | 1.00 | 1.5 | 30/62 | 48.4% |
10 | PIT | 4 | 31 | 0 | 8 | 7.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 3.1 | 5.10 | 7.1 | 49/64 | 76.6% |
11 | @PHI | 6 | 47 | 1 | 7 | 7.83 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 12.7 | 15.70 | 18.7 | 53/66 | 80.3% |
12 | DAL | 6 | 38 | 1 | 8 | 6.33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 9.8 | 12.80 | 15.8 | 53/70 | 75.7% |
13 | TEN | 3 | 35 | 1 | 6 | 11.67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 9.5 | 11.00 | 12.5 | 55/83 | 66.3% |
14 | BYE | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
15 | @NO | 2 | 25 | 0 | 2 | 12.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.5 | 3.50 | 4.5 | 18/78 | 23.1% |
16 | PHI | 1 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 12.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.2 | 1.70 | 2.2 | 48/68 | 70.6% |
17 | ATL | 6 | 72 | 2 | 7 | 12.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 19.2 | 22.20 | 25.2 | 55/83 | 66.3% |
18 | @DAL | 5 | 44 | 1 | 5 | 8.80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 10.4 | 12.90 | 15.4 | 53/58 | 91.4% |
Per game | 3.88 | 38.47 | 0.41 | 5.35 | 9.91 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 6.55 | 8.49 | 10.44 | 45.35/68.41 | 66.91% | |
Totals | 66 | 654 | 7 | 91 | 9.91 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 111.4 | 144.4 | 177.4 | 771/1163 | 66.91% |