2026 Fantasy Football Rankings - Standard
| Rank | Player | Team | BYE | Position-Rank | FF Pts | VOR | ADP ( Average ) | ADP Dif ( Average ) | ADP (BB10s) | ADP Dif (BB10s) | ADP (CBS) | ADP Dif (CBS) | ADP (Drafters) | ADP Dif (Drafters) | ADP (ESPN) | ADP Dif (ESPN) | ADP (Fantrax) | ADP Dif (Fantrax) | ADP (FFPC) | ADP Dif (FFPC) | ADP (NFFC) | ADP Dif (NFFC) | ADP (NFL) | ADP Dif (NFL) | ADP (Sleeper) | ADP Dif (Sleeper) | ADP (Underdog) | ADP Dif (Underdog) | ADP (Y!) | ADP Dif (Y!) | ADP (Superflex) | ADP Dif (Superflex) | ADP (FFPC SF) | ADP Dif (FFPC SF) | ADP (Sleeper SF) | ADP Dif (Sleeper SF) | GC | GC Dif |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jaxon Smith-Njigba
Draft Note
Every meaningful receiver metric points in the same direction with JSN. He led all wide receivers in ESPN OPEN score (100th percentile) and ranked 98th in OVERALL, and his PFF route grade (99th percentile) and YPRR (3.62, 99th percentile) were both at the top of the sample. The production matched: 119 receptions, 1,793 yards, and 10 touchdowns in 2025–a WR2 overall finish at 18.1 points per game. He also added an 82nd-percentile contested catch rate, which tells you he's not just a soft-route slot receiver who needs clean looks to function. Sam Darnold is a minor concern at quarterback–93rd percentile CPOE sounds great until you see the 14 interceptions–but Darnold got the job done last year and JSN is the rare receiver whose separation ability is good enough to overcome questionable quarterback play. He's going as the WR3 overall, and the metrics justify it.
| SEA | 11 | WR-1 | 207.7 | 106 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | -1 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| 2 | Christian McCaffrey
Draft Note
McCaffrey finished as the RB1 in half-PPR formats in 2025, but the caveat is significant–he appeared in just four games in 2024. When healthy, his production is driven almost entirely by the passing game. He led all running backs in targets (121) and route grade (99th percentile among qualified RBs), while ranking 3rd in YPRR (96th percentile)–a profile that sets him apart from traditional workhorses. The rushing efficiency tells a different story: his run grade (14th percentile) and YAC/Att (9th percentile) are well below average, suggesting he's no longer the same threat between the tackles. However, given his receiving, the upside is the weekly RB1 ceiling when healthy.
| SF | 8 | RB-1 | 220.5 | 102 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 0 | -2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| 3 | Puka Nacua
Draft Note
Nacua led all receivers in ESPN OVERALL score (100th percentile) and was 99th in OPEN, and his PFF route grade (100th percentile) and YPRR (3.71, 100th percentile) were both the best in the entire sample. He backed it up: 129 receptions, 1,715 yards, 10 touchdowns, and a WR1 overall finish at 19.3 points per game in 2025. He also had a 91st-percentile contested catch rate and 86th-percentile YAC per reception, making him effective at every phase of the route. Two flags on his profile is the durability history–he played 11 games in 2024 before returning for a full 2025–and Matthew Stafford's age. Both are real risks, but Stafford was elite last season (91st-percentile EPA) and Nacua's separation ability means he doesn't require elite quarterback play to produce. The other outstanding issue is a potential suspension, though it sounds as it it may be a short one if it comes at all, per Adam Schefter. He's going as the overall WR2, and the metrics make it very difficult to argue with, despite the red flags.
| LAR | 11 | WR-2 | 191.7 | 90 | 1 | -2 | 0 | -3 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | -3 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| 4 | Jahmyr Gibbs
Draft Note
Gibbs has finished as the RB3 and RB4 in back-to-back seasons, putting together one of the most consistent two-year runs at the position. His production is built around pre-contact efficiency–his YBC/Att ranks at the 95th percentile, stemming from Detroit's zone-running scheme and his ability to hit gaps quickly. He's less effective once contact arrives (20th-percentile YAC/Att), so the offense needs to keep creating clean looks for him, and it likely will. His receiving ability is elite–his route grade (97th percentile) and target share (96th percentile) rank among the best at the position, and his 1.67 YPRR underscores how efficiently he converts catches into yardage. The opportunity picture looks improved entering 2026. Detroit has 161 vacated RB carries–5th-most in the NFL–including 16 vacated carries inside the five. With David Montgomery out and Isiah Pacheco stepping in as the handcuff, Gibbs could absorb more of that red-zone and overall touch volume.
| DET | 6 | RB-2 | 249.0 | 130 | 7 | 3 | 0 | -4 | 1 | -3 | 1 | -3 | 1 | -3 | 1 | -3 | 1 | -3 | 1 | -3 | 0 | -4 | 1 | -3 | 1 | -3 | 0 | -4 | 1 | -3 | 1 | -3 | 1 | -3 | 1 | -3 |
| 5 | Bijan Robinson
Draft Note
Robinson has quietly been one of the more consistent backs in the league, finishing RB4 and RB3 in back-to-back seasons. What sets him apart is the receiving profile–he led all running backs in YPRR (99th percentile) and ranked 2nd in targets (97th percentile), posting 79 catches for 820 yards and four scores. As a rusher he's well-rounded–97th-percentile elusive rating, 85th-percentile YBC/Att–without a glaring weak spot. Atlanta enters 2026 with 143 vacated RB carries, 6th-most in the NFL–via Tyler Allgeier’s departure, though Brian Robinson will replace him–so there's a chance Bijan’s touch volume grows. A high-floor, high-ceiling RB1.
| ATL | 11 | RB-3 | 245.7 | 127 | 8 | 3 | 0 | -5 | 2 | -3 | 2 | -3 | 2 | -3 | 2 | -3 | 2 | -3 | 2 | -3 | 0 | -5 | 2 | -3 | 2 | -3 | 0 | -5 | 2 | -3 | 3 | -2 | 2 | -3 | 2 | -3 |
| 6 | Jonathan Taylor
Draft Note
Taylor finished as the RB2 in half-PPR formats in 2025, trailing only Christian McCaffrey. After an injury-shortened 2024 that dropped him to RB14 in 13 games, he returned with a full workload and validated his standing as a top-tier bell cow. The efficiency leans heavily on what he does after contact–his YAC/Att ranked at the 88th percentile among qualified backs. His 82nd-percentile PFF run grade confirms he's operating at an above-average level as a runner even when the blocking isn't generating much pre-contact space (57th-percentile YBC/Att). The receiving role is solid but not spectacular–54 targets, 46 catches, 378 yards–enough to support his half-PPR ceiling without driving it. A locked-in workhorse with elite after-contact traits. Draft him as a high-floor RB1.
| IND | 13 | RB-4 | 251.2 | 132 | 12 | 6 | 0 | -6 | 5 | -1 | 8 | 2 | 5 | -1 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 0 | -6 | 5 | -1 | 8 | 2 | 0 | -6 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 2 |
| 7 | Ja'Marr Chase
Draft Note
Chase was the overall WR1 in 2024 at nearly 20 points per game. In 2025, with Burrow missing significant time, he finished WR5 overall and WR4 per game, which is still elite. The underlying metrics remain at the top of the position: 98th-percentile route grade, 91st-percentile YPRR, and a 94th-percentile ESPN YAC score that reflects his elite run-after-catch ability, which shows up in his 84th-percentile PFF YAC per reception as well. He's going as the WR1 overall, and the entire bet is Joe Burrow's health–Chase with a functional Burrow is the best receiver in fantasy football.
| CIN | 6 | WR-3 | 206.6 | 105 | 11 | 4 | 0 | -7 | 3 | -4 | 3 | -4 | 3 | -4 | 3 | -4 | 3 | -4 | 3 | -4 | 0 | -7 | 3 | -4 | 3 | -4 | 0 | -7 | 4 | -3 | 4 | -3 | 4 | -3 | 3 | -4 |
| 8 | Saquon Barkley
Draft Note
Barkley went from the overall RB1 in 2024 to RB13 in 2025, and the efficiency numbers suggest the regression may be real. His run grade fell to the 60th percentile, his elusive rating to the 48th, and his YAC/Att to the 14th. Not great. The receiving role was voluminous (86th-percentile target share) but not efficient; his route grade ranked at the 14th percentile and his YPRR (0.84) was below average. Philadelphia added tackle Markel Bell in the third round, but he’s known more as a pass-blocker than a mauler in the run game. Barkley is 29, entrenched as the starter, and volume and touchdown opportunities should be fine. Which was the outlier–2024 or 2025? The data leans toward the former.
| PHI | 10 | RB-5 | 189.4 | 71 | 6 | -2 | 0 | -8 | 13 | 5 | 13 | 5 | 13 | 5 | 14 | 6 | 16 | 8 | 15 | 7 | 0 | -8 | 10 | 2 | 12 | 4 | 212 | 204 | 18 | 10 | 21 | 13 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 6 |
| 9 | Kyren Williams
Draft Note
Williams finished RB6 and RB8 in back-to-back seasons–the fantasy community continues to underestimate him, yet he continues to produce. Williams has quietly been one of the best fantasy backs in the league in the last three years, scoring 44 total touchdowns while averaging 1,455 yards per season and averaging 4.6 yards per carry. His 91st-percentile run grade is the standout number. The Rams' scheme does a lot of the work, though–his 86th-percentile YBC/Att reflects good blocking as much as good running, and his elusive rating (35th percentile) and YAC/Att (52nd percentile) aren't generating much when the holes aren’t there, but the holes are usually there in Sean McVay’s scheme. The receiving role (36 catches) is fine, but nothing special. I’m expecting midrange to low-end RB1 numbers once again, so his midrange RB2 ADP is quite appealing.
| LAR | 11 | RB-6 | 179.9 | 61 | 5 | -4 | 0 | -9 | 28 | 19 | 29 | 20 | 31 | 22 | 27 | 18 | 32 | 23 | 32 | 23 | 0 | -9 | 24 | 15 | 31 | 22 | 4 | -5 | 41 | 32 | 46 | 37 | 38 | 29 | 31 | 22 |
| 10 | Josh Allen
Draft Note
Allen is the safest pick at the quarterback position, and it's not particularly close. He's finished QB1 and QB2 the last two seasons while playing all 34 games, and his consistency is remarkable—he's scored 20-plus fantasy points in 59% of games over that stretch with only four games below 10. His 2025 efficiency was elite: 93rd percentile in EPA per dropback and 87th percentile in CPOE, and the rushing remains the league's best fantasy cheat code at the position. Allen averaged 37.4 rushing yards per start with 14 rushing touchdowns last season. That's a RB2 season's worth of rushing touchdowns on top of 25 passing touchdowns, and it’s his third consecutive season with at least 12 rushing touchdowns. The Bills added D.J. Moore to a receiving corps that already includes Khalil Shakir and Dalton Kincaid, giving Allen arguably his deepest set of pass-catchers since Stefon Diggs was in Buffalo. He's going as the QB1 off the board with an overall ADP around pick 30, and that's the right price. The only question is whether you want to spend that draft capital on a quarterback when you could wait and get a value QB significantly later. But if you want the highest floor and the highest ceiling at the position, Allen is the pick. If the draft gets weird and the available options in the third round aren’t too appealing, then Allen is an extremely safe pick.
| BUF | 7 | QB-1 | 382.9 | 66 | 10 | 0 | 0 | -10 | 19 | 9 | 34 | 24 | 17 | 7 | 33 | 23 | 34 | 24 | 29 | 19 | 0 | -10 | 20 | 10 | 38 | 28 | 216 | 206 | 3 | -7 | 2 | -8 | 3 | -7 | 27 | 17 |
Our dynamic rankings utilize algorithms and site projections that can be customized for various scoring systems and roster needs. This produces a Value Over Replacement (VOR) calculation, the basis for our overall rankings. Overall rankings exclude defense and kickers.
Users can also choose to blend the rankings between VOR and Average Draft Position, to better prepare to draft without reaching too far for key players. We recommend starting with a VOR% value of 50% and adjusting from there to alter the weight between VOR and ADP.
Flex positions can be divvied up among the positions. For example, if a league has two starting running backs, three starting receivers, and a RB/WR flex, users can enter "2.5" for RB Starters and "3.5" for WR starters to place more emphasis on those positions.
VOR = Value Over Replacement, the calculation to rank players across positions based on their projected fantasy points and factoring the lineup requirements for your league
ADP = Average Draft Position rank from our multi-site ADP tool
ADP Dif = Difference between 4for4.com and ADP
GC = General Consensus ranking averaged from a large pool of fantasy analysts
GC Dif = Difference between 4for4.com and General Consensus







