
Draft Note by John Paulsen
Pitts finally delivered on a fraction of his draft pedigree in 2025, finishing as the overall TE2 with 88 receptions, 928 yards, and five touchdowns on 114 targets. The PFF metrics confirm the underlying talent is real: 86th-percentile route grade and 83rd-percentile YPRR among qualified tight ends. The ESPN receiver scores tell a more nuanced story—49th percentile in OPEN, 71st percentile OVERALL—suggesting that Pitts wins through size and athleticism rather than pure separation, which aligns with the trajectory of his career. The concern is the volatility that shadowed him even in a TE2 season: only six of 16 games went over 10 points, and five went under five. Both Bijan Robinson and Drake London will continue to act as a volume ceiling. In fact, Pitts’s scoring output doubled in the five games that London missed (7.4 vs. 15.5). Pitts is going as the TE7, which reflects the 2025 output without fully pricing in the inconsistency. He's a legitimate every-week starter who will frustrate you in the weeks when the touchdowns don't come.
Kyle Pitts
- TE
- , Atlanta Falcons
- 26
- 250 lbs
- 6' 6"
- Florida
- 82
- 1
Full Season Projection
- Full Season Projection
- Dfs Projection
Latest news

Tom Pelissero
·Dec 19, 2025 · 2:16 PM EST
2026 Draft note
Pitts finally delivered on a fraction of his draft pedigree in 2025, finishing as the overall TE2 with 88 receptions, 928 yards, and five touchdowns on 114 targets. The PFF metrics confirm the underlying talent is real: 86th-percentile route grade and 83rd-percentile YPRR among qualified tight ends. The ESPN receiver scores tell a more nuanced story—49th percentile in OPEN, 71st percentile OVERALL—suggesting that Pitts wins through size and athleticism rather than pure separation, which aligns with the trajectory of his career. The concern is the volatility that shadowed him even in a TE2 season: only six of 16 games went over 10 points, and five went under five. Both Bijan Robinson and Drake London will continue to act as a volume ceiling. In fact, Pitts’s scoring output doubled in the five games that London missed (7.4 vs. 15.5). Pitts is going as the TE7, which reflects the 2025 output without fully pricing in the inconsistency. He's a legitimate every-week starter who will frustrate you in the weeks when the touchdowns don't come.
2026 Strength of Schedule - ATL
| W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | W5 | W6 | W7 | W8 | W9 | W10 | W11 | W12 | W13 | W14 | W15 | W16 | W17 | W18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 @PIT | 4 CAR | 2 @GB | 17 @NO | 1 BAL | 13 CHI | 26 SF | 22 @TB | 31 CIN | 27 KC | BYE | 16 @MIN | 18 DET | 7 @CLE | 32 @WAS | 22 TB | 17 NO | 4 @CAR |
Schedule difficulty based on schedule-adjusted, positional defensive ranking. Top DEF = 1, bottom DEF = 32.
Game Stats
| Week | Opp | Rec | RecYds | RecTD | Tgts | YPR | RuAtt | RuYds | RuTD | Fum | YPC | STD | 0.5 PPR | PPR | Snaps | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TB | 7 | 59 | 0 | 8 | 8.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 5.9 | 9.40 | 12.9 | 59/76 | 77.6% |
| 2 | @MIN | 4 | 37 | 0 | 5 | 9.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 3.7 | 5.70 | 7.7 | 53/66 | 80.3% |
| 3 | @CAR | 4 | 39 | 0 | 6 | 9.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 3.9 | 5.90 | 7.9 | 54/66 | 81.8% |
| 4 | WAS | 5 | 70 | 1 | 5 | 14.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 13.0 | 15.50 | 18.0 | 48/65 | 73.8% |
| 5 | BYE | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | BUF | 3 | 18 | 0 | 4 | 6.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.8 | 3.30 | 4.8 | 65/70 | 92.9% |
| 7 | @SF | 7 | 62 | 0 | 10 | 8.86 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 6.2 | 9.70 | 13.2 | 53/65 | 81.5% |
| 8 | MIA | 9 | 59 | 0 | 9 | 6.56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 5.9 | 10.40 | 14.9 | 46/50 | 92.0% |
| 9 | @NE | 4 | 38 | 0 | 7 | 9.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 3.8 | 5.80 | 7.8 | 53/56 | 94.6% |
| 10 | @IND | 2 | 38 | 0 | 5 | 19.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 3.8 | 4.80 | 5.8 | 58/63 | 92.1% |
| 11 | CAR | 2 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 7.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.4 | 2.40 | 3.4 | 55/66 | 83.3% |
| 12 | @NO | 2 | 25 | 0 | 5 | 12.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.5 | 3.50 | 4.5 | 53/56 | 94.6% |
| 13 | @NYJ | 7 | 82 | 0 | 8 | 11.71 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 8.2 | 11.70 | 15.2 | 63/69 | 91.3% |
| 14 | SEA | 6 | 90 | 0 | 10 | 15.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 9.0 | 12.00 | 15.0 | 59/64 | 92.2% |
| 15 | @TB | 11 | 166 | 3 | 12 | 15.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 34.6 | 40.10 | 45.6 | 68/71 | 95.8% |
| 16 | @ARI | 7 | 57 | 1 | 9 | 8.14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 11.7 | 15.20 | 18.7 | 67/77 | 87.0% |
| 17 | LAR | 2 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 8.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.6 | 2.60 | 3.6 | 49/53 | 92.5% |
| 18 | NO | 6 | 58 | 0 | 9 | 9.67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 5.8 | 8.80 | 11.8 | 58/63 | 92.1% |
| Per game | 5.18 | 54.59 | 0.29 | 6.94 | 10.55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 7.22 | 9.81 | 12.40 | 56.53/64.47 | 87.97% | |
| Totals | 88 | 928 | 5 | 118 | 10.55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 122.8 | 166.8 | 210.8 | 961/1096 | 87.97% | |






