Jordan Addison: The Classic Roster Clogger Fantasy Managers Should Avoid

Jordan Addison's 2024 sophomore season revealed the harsh realities of NFL progression. A successful rookie season doesn't always lead to a massaive Year 2. The Vikings receiver posted 63 receptions for 911 yards and 9 touchdowns across 17 games, which were a dip from his first season. His ADP, in the WR35-40 range is the stereotypical roster clogger that can sink your season. There's no doubt that he has talent but his fantasy ceiling may be capped by role limitations and inconsistent target distribution in Minnesota's evolving offensive hierarchy.

Click here for more 2025 Player Profiles!

DraftKings is giving ALL customers a can't-miss offer for Best Ball: Draft One, Get One! Enter a lineup in the $15 Million Best Ball Contest for just $20, and you'll score another Best Ball ticket to play FREE for a share of $15 million—giving you a second shot to win big!

Concerning Statistical Regression

In 2024, Addison was a model of diminished efficiency in Minnesota's offense. His catch rate suffered (60.0 percent on 63 receptions with 105 targets) and production dropped from his more dependable rookie year. Worse still was his failure to create big plays on a regular basis (he averaged 14.5 yards per catch with only nine games of 50 receiving yards or more).

Addison is never going to be the alpha with a healthy Justin Jefferson in the mix. While he managed 6.2 targets per game across the season, this volume was heavily dependent on game script and the health of other receivers. His snap share averaged around 75-85% in most contests. There was steady playing time, but the the targets he received weren't always high-value targets.

Perhaps most concerning was Addison's red zone involvement, or lack thereof. Despite the Vikings' potent offensive attack, Addison found the end zone in only six games, with three of those touchdowns coming in a single explosive performance against Chicago in Week 12. It's hard to complain about a three touchdown performance but when the touchdowns are few and far between, the complaints seem more justified.

Role Competition and Offensive Evolution

The primary obstacle to Addison's fantasy upside lies in a few places: Minnesota's receiver hierarchy and Kevin O'Connell's offensive philosophy. While Addison maintains a consistent role as the team's primary slot receiver and secondary option, he just simply won't surpass Jefferson. Jefferson's presence naturally limits the ceiling for all other Vikings receivers. It's hard to imagine a scenario where Addison functions as more than a complementary piece.

The emergence of other receiving threats further complicates Addison's outlook. T.J. Hockenson's return to health provides Sam Darnold (or potentially J.J. McCarthy) with a reliable intermediate target, while the development of other young receivers could eat into Addison's target share. Minnesota's balanced offensive approach, which heavily features the running game, also limits the overall passing volume available to support multiple fantasy-relevant receivers.

Addison's role as primarily a possession receiver working from the slot limits his explosive play potential. While he demonstrates reliable hands and route-running precision, his frame doesn't provide the contested-catch ability or red zone presence that elevates receivers into consistent fantasy starter territory. His average of 14.5 yards per reception reflects this limitation, as he rarely breaks free for the type of explosive gains that define WR2 fantasy production.

Quarterback Situation and System Fit

The Vikings' quarterback situation adds another layer of uncertainty to Addison's outlook. While he showed decent chemistry with Sam Darnold in 2024, the potential debut of J.J. McCarthy could change everything. In theory, McCarthy's college profile as a conservative, higher-percentage passer could benefit Addison's skill set.

O'Connell's offensive system has proven capable of supporting multiple fantasy-relevant receivers, but the distribution tends to favor one primary option (Jefferson) while leaving others fighting for scraps. Addison's production often came in bunches, with several multi-touchdown games masking longer stretches of minimal fantasy impact. This boom-or-bust tendency makes him a challenging player to rely upon for consistent weekly production.

The Vikings' emphasis on play-action and intermediate routes should benefit Addison's skill set, but the reality is that Jefferson commands the majority of these high-value, quick-hitter targets. Addison frequently operates in the underneath areas, generating volume through short completions.

Draft Strategy and Value Assessment

At his current ADP in the WR35-40 range, Addison represents a classic "roster clogger". He has enough name value that managers will find it difficult to cut bait even when it's clear that he shouldn't be relied on in your fantasy lineup. His floor appears relatively safe given his role, security, and snap share, but the structural limitations of his situation severely cap his ceiling.

Fantasy managers drafting Addison should view him as a bench receiver with occasional streaming upside rather than a reliable starter. His touchdown dependency and inconsistent target quality make him unsuitable for weekly plug and play, though he could provide spot-start value in favorable matchups or through the bye weeks.

The opportunity cost of selecting Addison becomes apparent when considering the alternative players available in similar ADP ranges. Younger receivers with clearer paths to increased target share, or veterans in more pass-heavy offenses, may offer superior risk-adjusted returns despite lower name recognition.

The Bottom Line

• Sophomore slump with systemic limitations
  • ​ Despite maintaining his role, Addison's 60.0% catch rate and 14.5 yards per reception reflect efficiency concerns that may extend beyond typical second-year growing pains.
• Capped ceiling in crowded hierarchy
  • Operating as Minnesota's third receiving option behind Jefferson and Hockenson limits Addison's weekly upside, while the team's balanced offensive approach restricts overall passing volume.
• Touchdown-dependent production pattern
  • Six of his nine touchdowns came in just three games, highlighting the boom-or-bust nature that makes him unreliable for consistent fantasy production.
• Role security without upside
  • While his snap share and target floor appear relatively safe, the structural limitations of his situation make meaningful growth unlikely without significant changes to Minnesota's offensive hierarchy.
• Poor draft value at current ADP
  • Being selected in the WR35-40 range overvalues a player whose ceiling appears capped at low-end WR3 production with significant weekly volatility.
• Avoid Addison in most drafts
  • His combination of touchdown dependency and opportunity cost makes him a poor investment at current ADP, better suited for waiver wire consideration or very late-round fliers in deeper formats.