Tyler Boyd Fantasy Football Profile, News and Stats

Tyler Boyd
WR
, Cincinnati Bengals

Age: 26
Weight: 197 lbs
Height: 6' 1"

ADP: 76
Depth Chart Ranking: 1

Pts	RecYds	RecTD	Rec	RuYds
94.9	725	3	72	38

Week 13 Projection

Week 13 Projection
Dfs Projection

Week 13
CIN
@
MIA

Unlock our Projections

View full WR Projections

Salary: $4700
Week 13 Projection: 13.35
Ownership: -

Salary: $6600
Week 13 Projection: 10.22
Ownership: -

Salary: $16
Week 13 Projection: 10.22
Ownership: -

Left-scroll
middle-scroll
Right-scroll

Draft note

by John Paulsen

Boyd finished with 90-1,046-5 on 148 targets in 2019, resulting in a No. 23 finish. Andy Dalton only played 13 games, and in those games, Boyd played at a 96-1,086-5.0 pace, which represent solid WR2 numbers. In 2018, he finished with 76-1,028-7 on 108 targets finishing No. 17. A.J. Green is theoretically back this season and Boyd’s 2018 splits with Green (6.1-80-0.56 on 8.2 targets per game) are encouraging, though much has changed in Cincinnati since 2018. The Bengals have a new offense and a new quarterback (Joe Burrow). Boyd is going off the board as a midrange WR3 and that seems about right.

Latest news

Bengals WR John Ross seeking trade

Mike Garafolo on Twitter

Oct 20 · 11:09 AM EDT

Bengals WR John Ross approached the team about a trade recently.

Related players: Tee Higgins, Tyler Boyd

Fantasy Impact:

Ross, in the last year of his rookie deal, hasn't been playing much of late and wants a fresh start if that's going to continue being the case. He was inactive for three weeks and played just one snap this past week. Garafolo said talks haven't gone far. Ross is buried a bit on the depth chart thanks to Boyd and perhaps especially Higgins who is emerging this year. There are two weeks until the trade deadline.

Scouting report

by Chris Kucharski

· Nov 27 · 11:02 AM EST

CIN WR Tyler Boyd - Week 12 Fantasy Football Outlook

Week 12 vs. New York Giants
Tyler Boyd had a decent game against Washington despite losing quarterback Joe Burrow who is now out for the season. Boyd had 11 targets which produced 9 receptions for 85 yards. We expect those targets to continue with new quarterback Brandon Allen taking over, but how good the passing game will be for Cincy is a huge question.

The Giants come to town ranked 15th in aFPA to wide receivers. The veteran receivers should still see their share of targets and Boyd still will have the most fantasy value overall of the Bengals skill players.

Boyd still has value in PPR leagues for Week 12 as a WR3 or flex. However, sit Boyd in standard leagues. The receptions should be there but the other receiving stats will hurt with Burrow out.

2020 Strength of Schedule - CIN

W1	W2	W3	W4	W5	W6	W7	W8	W9	W10	W11	W12	W13	W14	W15	W16	W17
17 LAC	19 @CLE	20 @PHI	24 JAX	5 @BAL	16 @IND	19 CLE	21 TEN	BYE	22 @PIT	3 @WAS	12 NYG	9 @MIA	32 DAL	22 PIT	29 @HOU	5 BAL

Schedule difficulty based on schedule-adjusted, positional defensive ranking. Top DEF = 1, bottom DEF = 32.

2020 Game Stats


Week	Opp	Rec	RecYds	RecTD	Tgts	YPR	RuAtt	RuYds	RuTD	Fum	YPC	STD	PPR	Snaps	%
1	LAC	4	33	0	5	8.25	0	0	0	0	0.00	3.3	7.3	55/68	80.9%
2	@CLE	7	72	1	8	10.29	0	0	0	0	0.00	13.2	20.2	78/92	84.8%
3	@PHI	10	125	0	13	12.50	0	0	0	0	0.00	12.5	22.5	54/72	75.0%
4	JAX	7	90	0	8	12.86	1	4	0	0	4.00	9.4	16.4	58/75	77.3%
5	@BAL	4	42	0	6	10.50	0	0	0	0	0.00	4.2	8.2	46/67	68.7%
6	@IND	5	54	0	8	10.80	1	25	0	0	25.00	7.9	12.9	57/73	78.1%
7	CLE	11	101	1	13	9.18	0	0	0	0	0.00	16.7	27.7	60/75	80.0%
8	TEN	6	67	1	7	11.17	2	9	0	0	4.50	13.6	19.6	55/73	75.3%
9	BYE	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
10	@PIT	6	41	0	8	6.83	0	0	0	0	0.00	4.1	10.1	52/65	80.0%
11	@WAS	9	85	0	11	9.44	0	0	0	0	0.00	8.5	17.5	56/68	82.4%
12	NYG	3	15	0	6	5.00	0	0	0	0	0.00	1.5	4.5	40/49	81.6%
Per game		6.55	65.91	0.27	8.45	10.07	0.36	3.45	0	0	9.50	8.63	15.18	55.55/70.64	78.55%
Totals		72	725	3	93	10.07	4	38	0	0	9.50	94.94	166.94	611/777	78.55%

Previous Games vs. MIA


Season	Week	Opp	Rec	RecYds	RecTD	Tgts	YPR	RuAtt	RuYds	RuTD	Fum	STD	PPR	Snaps	%
2019	16	@MIA	9	128	2	15	14.22	0	0	0	0	24.8	33.8	83/90	92.22%
2018	5	MIA	4	44	0	7	11.00	0	0	0	0	4.4	8.4	45/60	75.00%
2016	4	MIA	1	10	0	3	10.00	0	0	0	0	1.0	2.0	28/70	40.00%
Average			4.67	60.67	0.67	8.33	11.74	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	10.07	14.73	52.00/73.33	69.07%