Would you ever bench TBrady in this matchup with multiple receiving options out. Also playing a very good DEN secondary. To start JMcCown who had 40 fantasy points against BALT already. I know it goes against conventional thinking to sit Brady and you might say someone is chasing a matchup with a lesser talented player that might not be able to capitalize on the matchup. But he proved it when he did it already. Through your previous experience especially with QB's if a player goes off in a division game does he do it again usually or is it severly worse the second time around. I got to tell you right now I got JMcCown to start. Call it contrarian or whatever give me an argument for TBrady VS JMcCown in this matchup. What would you do???
You can justify it, but I just don't sit guys like Brady. Ware being out should help Brady, but I don't usually worry about his receivers. Brady usually finds a way to make use of the guys he does have on the field. I don't bench a guy like Brady, but fantasy football can sometimes be just as much about your gut as it is about anything else, so if you feel like McCown is going to have the better outing, then it's ultimately your call.
