How Effective Will Marshawn Lynch Be in 2017?

How Effective Will Marshawn Lynch Be in 2017?

By John Paulsen (Senior Editor), last update Jul 2, 2017

John Paulsen's picture

John was named the Most Accurate Fantasy Football Expert by FantasyPros for the 2010 and 2014 seasons, and has finished in the Top 6 in seven of the last eight years. Cumulatively, John has been the most accurate expert from 2010-17 while also winning the 2011 Fantasy Sports Trade Association award for the most accurate draft rankings. 

Follow John Paulsen on Twitter: @4for4_John.

When we last saw Marshawn Lynch on the football field, he was struggling through an injury-plagued age-29 season in Seattle. He averaged 17.7 touches for 71 yards and 0.43 touchdowns, or 11.5 fantasy points (PPR) per game. That was the 28th-highest per game average that year, so he was playing at a fantasy RB3 pace. He had a 3.76 YPC, which was a good bit lower than his career 4.41 YPC after joining the Seahawks.

Then he “retired,” which actually turned out to be a year-long sabbatical, and he’s now back with his hometown Oakland Raiders on a two-year deal. It’s a savvy move for the soon-to-be Las Vegas Raiders to sign a local star who can put butts in the seats while the team plans its departure from the Bay Area.

But what sort of season can we reasonably expect from a now 31-year-old who spent a year away from football and wasn’t all that effective the last time we saw him play?

Comparables

One way to answer that question is to look at his comparables. Below you’ll find a table of the 21 running backs who carried the ball at least 600 times from age 27 to age 29, rushed for at least 2,500 yards and played (at least) through their age 31 season. (I also filtered out those players who didn’t start at least 50% of their games played in their age 31 season, since we’re expecting Lynch to start for the Raiders if he’s healthy enough to play.)

Qualified Running Backs - Age 31 Season Production
Player G Att Yds YPC TD Y/G
Curtis Martin 16 371 1697 4.57 12 106.1
Tiki Barber 16 327 1662 5.08 5 103.9
Thomas Jones 16 331 1402 4.24 14 87.6
Ricky Watters 16 278 1242 4.47 7 77.6
Emmitt Smith 16 294 1203 4.09 9 75.2
Fred Taylor 15 223 1202 5.39 5 80.1
Warrick Dunn 16 286 1140 3.99 4 71.3
Frank Gore 16 255 1106 4.34 4 69.1
LaDainian Tomlinson 15 219 914 4.17 6 60.9
Terry Allen 16 254 896 3.53 8 56.0
Priest Holmes 8 196 892 4.55 14 111.5
Matt Forte 14 218 813 3.73 7 58.1
Jerome Bettis 16 246 811 3.30 7 50.7
Marshall Faulk 14 195 774 3.97 3 55.3
Corey Dillon 12 209 733 3.51 12 61.1
Steven Jackson 15 190 707 3.72 6 47.1
Thurman Thomas 16 154 643 4.18 1 40.2
Charlie Garner 14 120 553 4.61 3 39.5
Stephen Davis 13 180 549 3.05 12 42.2
Eddie George 13 132 432 3.27 4 33.2
Adrian Peterson 3 37 72 1.95 0 24.0

Here’s summary of how those backs performed from age 27-29 compared to what they produced in their age 31 season.

Comparing Age 27-29 RB Averages with Age 31 Performance
Group G Att Yds YPC TD
Age 27-29 14.9 18.8 79.7 4.23 0.54
Age 31 14.1 15.9 65.7 4.12 0.48
% Drop 5% 15% 18% 3% 11%

These 21 backs experienced, on average, a five percent drop in games played, a 15 percent drop in rushing attempts per game, an 18 percent drop in rushing yards per game, a three percent drop in YPC, and an 11 percent drop in touchdowns per game.

Applying these reductions to Lynch’s age 27-29 averages, we get the following projections:

Using Comparables to Project 2017 Marshawn Lynch
Player G Att Yds YPC TD Y/G
Marshawn Lynch 12.3 195 819 4.19 7.9 66.6

Lynch was one of the less durable backs in the study during his age 27-29 seasons, thanks to his nine missed games in 2016, so his games played projection lands at 12.3. Staying healthy will be key.

Current Projections

You’ll notice that our current projections (225 carries, 859 yards, 9.5 touchdowns) are a bit more bullish about Lynch’s overall rushing production. I like the landing spot in Oakland, where there’s an excellent offensive line in place, along with a quality passing game that is capable of taking the pressure off of Lynch to carry the offense.

I also believe that the year off could lead to better overall health since his body wasn’t taking a beating in 2016. Instead, it was recovering from a tough 2015 season.

On the flip side, there's also the argument that Lynch can’t possibly be in “football shape,” so staying healthy throughout the offseason programs (to get the necessary reps) would be great for his overall outlook.

The Bottom Line

Lynch is currently going with the 44th pick in the 4th round of MFL10 (12-team PPR) drafts, which seems reasonable given the other running backs – Joe Mixon, Isaiah Crowell, Carlos Hyde, Dalvin Cook, Mark Ingram and Tevin Coleman – going at about the same point in early drafts.

Considering his likely backup, DeAndre Washington, isn’t being drafted inside the top 60 running backs, it looks like this is a pretty cheap running game to buy into. (Note: Jalen Richard is also in the mix, but I think Washington’s college career better prepared him for a 12-carry role if Lynch were to miss time. Washington out-carried Richard by a margin of 26-to-15 in the three games that Murray either missed or was limited.) If I could only draft one of the Oakland running backs, it would be Washington, due to his relative cost.

Prospective Lynch owners should expect two to four missed games when putting together their teams. Age 31 running backs tend to miss an extra game when compared to their more youthful counterparts and Lynch’s injury struggles in 2015 aren’t particularly encouraging.

But when he plays, he should carry the load (14-16 carries per game, a bit more than what Latavius Murray saw in his 13 relatively healthy games). Double-digit touchdowns are a distinct possibility, given the quality of Oakland’s offense and Lynch’s ability to punch it into the end zone.

Filed Under:
Preseason
,
2017

We are your friend's secret weapon.

  • Get 4 FREE downloads
  • Receive breaking news alerts & analysis
  • BONUS: Learn how to play DFS.
  • Battle-Tested by 40,000+ fantasy football diehards since 1999.