DFS Playbook Strategy: How to Pick a Defense/Special Teams

Sep 01, 2017
DFS Playbook Strategy: How to Pick a Defense/Special Teams

If you treat the D/ST slot as an afterthought, you're giving away money in daily fantasy football. So with all due apologies to any DFS philanthropists out there, this article will show you how to make profitable decisions at the D/ST slot.

We'll begin with the key to making accurate projections for D/ST, then go into proven ways to maximize the rate at which your D/ST provides value relative to its salary, and conclude by revealing which strategies first-place winners are using at D/ST to take down the biggest guaranteed prize pool tournaments.

DFS Playbook 2017: QB | RB | WR | TE | K | DFS Strategy Hub

Leverage Vegas Odds for Accurate D/ST Projections

Despite being largely determined by relatively rare, difficult-to-predict events such as turnovers and return TDs, and thus being subjected to the largest weekly fluctuations of any fantasy position, D/ST scoring tends to follow a predictable pattern: The better the Vegas odds, the more fantasy points a D/ST will score.

Defensive Stats, Home-Road/Favorite-Underdog (2014-16)
Split DK Pts FD Pts PA Sack Int D/ST TD
Road Favorite 8.5 8.6 20.1 2.3 1.05 0.25
Home Favorite 8.3 8.3 20.4 2.5 0.86 0.21
Home Underdog 6.3 6.3 24.1 2.2 0.76 0.15
Road Underdog 6.2 6.2 25.6 2.1 0.79 0.16

The D/ST of Vegas favorites have historically outscored those of Vegas underdogs by about 33%. Looking at whether a team is the favorite or the underdog is useful not only for predicting erratic events like return TDs, but even the rare instances of a shutout—the favorite has accounted for eight of the 12 shutouts over the past three seasons.

Favorites on the road edge those at home in most categories because road favorites tend to be the highest-quality teams in a league where roughly just one-third of teams playing on the road will be viewed the favorite in a given game.

But it is not just high-quality teams that see an edge as the favorite. Roughly half of the D/ST over the past three seasons that have been below the league average in fantasy scoring as the underdog have been above the league average in fantasy scoring as the favorite.

For instance, the Lions were an absolute donkey play as the underdog in 2016, averaging a paltry 3.7 DraftKings points per game in 10 games. But in their six games as the favorite, that scoring average shot up to a respectable 8.2 points per game, 1.5 above the league average. Or take the Dolphins, who averaged 5.8 DraftKings points per game in 11 games as the underdog, but 11.3 points per game in five games as the favorite (third-best in the league).

Of course, that makes the inverse true as well. The vaunted Broncos defense finished third overall in DraftKings scoring (9.7 points per game), but most of their damage was done while playing as the favorite, where in nine games they averaged a league-best 12.9 points per game. In seven games as the underdog, the Broncos morphed into a below-average 5.6-point-per-game unit.

Why are favorite-underdog splits so stark in regards to D/ST fantasy scoring? Because how likely a team is to win or lose a given game indirectly serves as a predictor of opposing passing play volume (the league average offense throws 33% more when playing from behind). Facing a high amount of passing plays is crucial to a defense because it is on those plays that all interceptions, sacks, and roughly 60% of fumbles—as well as any resulting TDs from those plays—occur, which is why there is a positive correlation between opposing passing play volume and D/ST fantasy scoring.1

As you might imagine, the less points the Vegas odds imply a team will allow, the better it is for the fantasy outlook of its D/ST:

Correlation of Vegas Odds to D/ST DFS Points (2014–16)
Correlation (DK Pts) Correlation (FD Pts)
Opp Implied Points -.231 Opp Implied Points -.235
Spread -.211 Spread -.213
Salary .181 Salary .155
Over/Under -.101 Over/Under -.105

Since implied team total reflects how well or poorly an offense is expected to play, it also essentially backs into capturing in one number the likelihood of sacks, interceptions, and fumbles, which are all difficult to predict on their own because past performance offers negligible short-term predictive value.2 (The over/under is simply a means to arrive at implied total and is of little predictive value when taken on its own.)

Looking for a DFS lineup optimizer powered by industry's most accurate projections? Subscribe to 4for4 now!

2 Keys for D/ST Cash Game Lineup Construction

D/ST tends to be the most volatile fantasy position, and because the common practice of targeting a uniform linear value multiplier—3x for 150 DraftKings points or 2x for 120 FanDuel points, for example—at all positions fails to account for this volatility, it can lead to suboptimal lineup construction. I've derived a formula that calculates how many points to target from a D/ST using a series of regressions that explain the relationship between position, salary, and scoring expectation:

D/ST cash game target score for 150 DraftKings points (3x) = 3.6 + (salary * 0.00215)

D/ST cash game target score for 120 FanDuel points (2x) = -0.52 + (salary * 0.00205)

One of the most important things that the cash game target scores can tell us is that even if we are targeting 150 total DraftKings points, for instance, a $2,000 punt D/ST like the Falcons in Week 11 of 2016 would have needed to score 2.15 points per $1,000 on top of a starting-point floor of 3.6 points, for a total of 7.9 points, or 3.95x—than than 3x.3 Interestingly, D/ST on FanDuel is the only position where the necessary value multiplier increases (albeit slightly) as salary goes up (which is indicated by the formula's negative slope).

D/ST Cash Game Target Score Examples
DK Salary ($) DK Pt Cash Target DK Pts/$1,000 Value FD Salary ($) FD Pt Cash Target FD Pts/$1,000 Value
4000 12.2 3.05 5200 10.1 1.95
3500 11.1 3.18 4900 9.5 1.94
3000 10.1 3.35 4600 8.9 1.94
2500 9.0 3.59 4300 8.3 1.93
2000 7.9 3.95 4000 7.7 1.92

Because these illuminating cash game target scores are adjusted for positional- and salary-based expectation, they can be used to reveal the sharpest lineup construction tactics for the D/ST slot, which can be done by comparing the consistency rates of D/ST in various splits and salary ranges.

1. Target Favorites to Maximize Consistency

As fun as one might be to root for in real life, an underdog should almost never find its way into a cash game lineup in DFS:

Interestingly, FanDuel seems to be overcompensating for home field advantage somewhat, which has made road favorites the most consistent cash game plays on the site.

2. Target the Middle Salary Ranges for Cost-Effective Consistency

Perhaps realizing that punting with a sub-$2,200 option was working a little too well in 2015, DraftKings priced a D/ST in that range only 14 times in 2016, compared to 45 the year before. Assuming the site continues that trend, the sweet spot for cash value from a D/ST looks to be in the $3,100–$3,300 range. Paying up beyond that into the upper $3,000s has offered uneven results, while dropping down below it to the mid-$2,000s has been trap-play territory.

DraftKings Cash game Target Score Consistency Rate (2015-16)
Salary ($) D Cons% n (D) TE Cons% n (TE)
4000+ 20.0% 20 31.3% 492
3700–3900 32.3% 65 28.4% 95
3400–3600 25.8% 128 27.1% 133
3100–3300 36.4% 269 28.2% 156
2800–3000 29.1% 402 25.3% 166
2500–2700 25.7% 370 22.2% 108
2200–2400 29.9% 211
Under 2200 35.2% 71

Data does not include TEs projected for below 7.5 points in a given week by 4for4.

The fact that D/ST consistency peaks in the middle of the position's salary range makes sense, as it is in that range where you will tend to be able to find a solid defense with favorable Vegas odds. Meanwhile, a large portion of the sample suggests there is a sharp decline in consistency as salary dips from the low $3,000s into the mid-$2,000s. This also intuitively makes sense because those are the ranges in which underdogs most often tend to reside.

Like those on DraftKings, D/ST on FanDuel have also hit peak consistency in the middle of their salary range, although on FanDuel it has been a bit more toward the higher end of the middle range, or right around the $5,000 mark. There has been a clear sweet spot for consistency rate in the upper-$4,000s-to-mid-$5,000s:

FanDuel Cash Game Target Score Consistency Rate (2013-16)
Salary ($) D/ST Cons% n (D/ST) K Cons% n (K)
5600+ 20.0% 15 0.0% 2
5400–5500 30.9% 55 32.3% 31
5200–5300 36.4% 118 38.1% 97
5000–5100 38.5% 143 37.0% 208
4800–4900 35.7% 210 35.6% 340
4600–4700 30.2% 288 31.2% 458
4400–4500 33.1% 332 29.9% 331
4200–4300 30.5% 210
4000–4100 33.1% 163

The D/ST position has generally hit peak consistency in the same salary range as kicker, which suggests employing a best of both worlds strategy of sorts, where you try and secure a D/ST and a kicker both priced in the upper-$4,000s. However, the drop-off from peak to floor in consistency rate has been steeper at kicker than at D/ST, so if forced to choose, bumping down in salary at D/ST will tend to be the smarter option.

Looking to optimize your cash game lineups by projected floor and expert picks/analysis?Subscribe to 4for4 now!

4 Strategies for Picking a Defense/Special Teams That Wins GPP Tournaments

Note: Data in this section was compiled from first-place lineups in the 2015–2016 DraftKings Millionaire Maker and FanDuel Sunday Million guaranteed prize pool tournaments.

Perhaps due to the higher salary floor on FanDuel, first-place lineups of the big GPP on that site have needed to nail their D/ST pick more so than those on DraftKings. While the D/ST slot in the DraftKings Millionaire Maker lineups averages by far the fewest points (15.2) of all slots in the lineup, the D/ST slot in the FanDuel Sunday Million lineups (18.4) has been on par with TE (18.4) and way ahead of kicker (12.7).

D/ST in 1st-Place Lineups (2015-16)
Site/GPP Points Salary ($) Own%
FanDuel Sunday Million 18.4 4679 10.0%
DraftKings Millionaire Maker 15.2 3144 12.0%

A deeper dive into the data reveals three key strategies the first-place lineups are using at the D/ST slot in order to take down tournaments.

1. Target Favorites for Maximum Upside

In what should be a familiar trend by now, D/ST that are favorites have accounted for roughly two-thirds of all big fantasy games at the position despite making up just half of all NFL games:

Underdogs have been more viable on DraftKings because first place hasn't required as high of a score from the D/ST there as it has on FanDuel. And whereas favorites on the road have been the most consistent cash game performers on FanDuel, favorites at home have had slightly more overall tournament upside.

2. Target the Middle Salary Range for Affordable Upside

Mirroring the most effective cash game strategy for the most part, first-place lineups in the large GPP tournaments mostly stuck to the middle salary tiers at the D/ST slot:

  • $2,800-3,400 range on DraftKings: 60% of the first-place lineups have used a D/ST in this range despite it accounting for just over 40% of available options.

  • $4,500-4,700 range on FanDuel: Over half of the first-place lineups have used a D/ST in this range despite it accounting for just one-third of available options.

(The first-place lineups that didn't go with a mid-tier option in the D/ST slot tended to pay up at a higher rate than they punted.)

3. Be Contrarian

Despite it being somewhat obscured by the position's ownership averages overall, the first-place lineups have been frequently using a low-owned D/ST (which is of course much easier to do when there is only one slot to fill). The D/ST in a first-place lineup had less than 6% ownership half of the time on FanDuel lineups, as well as roughly one-third of the time on DraftKings.

How do you go about finding the best contrarian plays for the D/ST slot? You can look toward the following:

  • Favorites projected for low ownership. Using 18 FanDuel points or 15 DraftKings points as a benchmark, roughly two-thirds of big games over the past three seasons have come while the D/ST is the favorite, including the Chiefs' six-interception day against Ryan Fitzpatrick in Week 3 of 2016 as a three-point favorite, which ended up winning that week's Sunday Million and being the highest score for a D/ST over the past three seasons (35 points).

  • Underdogs with close spreads. Underdogs become an option in tournaments because taking on risk is more acceptable in the name of securing a high score at low ownership. Roughly two-thirds of the big games by underdog D/ST over the past three seasons have had a spread closer than five points, such as when the Eagles won DraftKings user Jtortona the Millionaire Maker in Week 7 of 2016 with 24 points as a three-point underdog against the Vikings.

4. Take Advantage of Positional Correlations by Stacking

Roughly 2-in-5 first-place lineups on FanDuel and 1-in-5 first-place lineups on DraftKings have paired the D/ST with another player on its team, with two main positions being prevalent:

  • Running Back: Due to the correlation of running backs and defenses in favorable game-script situations, nearly all stacks with a D/ST in the first-place DraftKings lineups and half of those on FanDuel used a running back, including a contrarian Bills-LeSean McCoy stack against the Patriots in Week 4 of 2016 that won FanDuel user siksidin25 the Sunday Million.

  • Kicker: A very effective stack because it has the highest correlation besides QB-WR1, kicker-D/ST was responsible for the other half of D/ST stacks in winning Sunday Million lineups, most recently in Week 15 of 2016 with a Falcons-Matt Bryant stack that netted 22 combined points.

Pairing D/ST with RB or kicker works especially well because all three of those positions have proven to have a heightened chance of success when their team is playing with favorable Vegas odds.

Looking to optimize your tournament lineups by projected ceiling or expert picks/analysis?Subscribe to 4for4 now!

Daily Fantasy Playbook D/ST Strategy (Recap)

D/ST projection strategy:

  • Leverage the Vegas odds.

D/ST cash game strategy:

  • Target favorites to maximize consistency.
  • Target the middle salary ranges for cost-effective consistency.
    • DraftKings: $3,100–$3,300
    • FanDuel: $4,800–$5,100

D/ST tournament/GPP strategy:

  • Target favorites for maximum upside.
  • Target the middle salary range for affordable upside.
  • Be contrarian.
  • Take advantage of positional correlations by stacking.


1. The in-game correlation of opponent pass attempts to D/ST points was .310 on DraftKings and .308 on FanDuel from 2014-16. (back)

2. Using a weighted correlation from all possible sample sizes (1-15 games) in 2016, the highest correlation in the season average of stat category that affects D/ST to it's result in the next game was .123 for points allowed. (back)

3. They ended up hitting value with 11 points. (back)

Related Articles

About Author