|
Drafting Principles
and Tactics
by Greg Alan
Introduction
Gang, as you may know, I really love football. Studying the game, researching
and analyzing everything I can find to unearth applied insights. Sometimes,
the statistician in me comes out. Below is the Football Analyst side of my brain
talking to the old Statistician within. Whatever you call it, this essay is
intended to help you find an edge on draft day.
In this article,
I will cover:
1) Redefining the Draft – Targeting Valuable Starters
2) The Power and Pitfalls of Using Projected Yearly Data
3) Why Using Consensus Rankings is Often a Bad Idea
4) Drafting a Bargain - Just in Time
5) Bargains and Avoiding the Overspend
Targeting Valuable
Starters
I'll
briefly overview TVS – Targeting Valuable Starters. The TVS Principles
outlined below are widely applicable to both auction and non-auction league
draft formats.
Unlike other popular drafting
methods, TVS fully integrates five vital elements and delivers the results via a
parsimonious Power Rating.
In a nutshell, the TVS process determines a player’s draft day worth by:
1) Evaluating a player's ability to generate Fantasy Points relative to
your competitor's players at that same position
2) Evaluating a player's ability to generate Fantasy Points relative to
"easily obtainable" players via the waiver wire (free agent pool).
3) Evaluating a player's overall ability to generate Fantasy Points (via
his talent, durability, job security, consistency level, offensive system and
workload).
4) Evaluating a player's Strategic Value (example: key backup to a stud
RB).
5) In addition, TVS considers the number of effective Fantasy
Starts a
player will likely give you! This is a key and unique element used in the TVS
Power Rating computation.
Fortunately, most of your competitors won’t consider all these factors when
they evaluate and draft players. As such, by utilizing the TVS Power Rating,
you’ll have a competitive advantage.
Some Fantasy Football team owners utilize a mechanical drafting technique called
Value Based Drafting to select players. In the process, they attempt to utilize
projected season statistics to evaluate whom to draft. Projected stats help
determine the degree to which a given player will outscore other players at that
position. In addition, projected stats can help you evaluate potential draft
picks across different positions. Value Based methods are logical and often
result in a decent selection. In fact, TVS leverages the Value Based principle
in computing the TVS Power Rating.
However, value-based methods only give you part of the picture. TVS leverages
the good things about Value Based Drafting, avoids the problems and ultimately
delivers a more robust solution. TVS takes it to the next level!
A more insightful way to determine a player's worth on draft day can be had
by considering:
1) How many Fantasy Starts you'll likely obtain from that
player
2) When you start a player, how much he'll outscore (or be outscored by)
your opponent's starting players at the same position.
Player's Fantasy Worth = (# Fantasy Starts) x
(Relative Scoring Ability)
Strictly
speaking, a good Fantasy Draft consists of more than just obtaining a number of
high scoring studs. Rather, a good draft allows you to field an outstanding starting
lineup week-in and week-out. In addition, a successful Fantasy Draft must
yield a starting lineup that will consistently outscore your opponent's starting
lineup.
QUESTION:
Assuming your league starts two RBs each week and all the RBs stay healthy,
which backfield would you like to own? (see Table I and II)
|
Table
I: TEAM-A’s Running Backs
|
|
LaDainian Tomlinson
|
|
Shaun Alexander
|
|
Larry Johnson
|
|
Mike Anderson
(backup in
Baltimore)
|
|
Jerome Bettis (no longer playing)
|
|
Kevin Faulk (backup in NE)
|
|
Greg
Alan (4for4.com Analyst, never played a down in the NFL, never will)
|
|
Table
II: TEAM-B’s Running Backs
|
|
Lamont Jordan
|
|
Brian Westbrook
|
|
Ahman Green
|
|
DeShaun Foster
|
|
LenDale White
|
|
Vernand Morency
|
|
Reuben Droughns
|
Using projected season statistics, Team-B’s
forecast could earn you more Value Based points on draft day. And in total,
Team-B could generate more Yards and TDs.
So, which team would you like to own? A or B?
If you said “Team-A” you're halfway home to understanding TVS. Clearly in a
league that starts two RBs each week, Team-A is highly preferred over Team-B.
Why? Plain and simple, Team-A should deliver more valuable starts
than Team-B.
The take is simple! The
better job you can do at targeting and drafting valuable starters, the better
your draft. TVS helps you do just this.
So where do you find TVS values? Online, 4for4.com will post pre-calculated,
sortable TVS values. In addition, if you’re not afraid of some data
manipulation, you can certainly compute TVS values on your own. Regardless of if
you use 4for4.com's TVS values on-line, compute your own TVS data or simply
leverage the concepts (without the data), you’ll be better off than your
TVS-lacking competitors.
Before we get into more
specifics on TVS, it’s time for another example.
Let's pretend you own a crystal ball. For arguments sake, lets say it can
perfectly forecast yearly NFL player statistics.
You asked and your amazing crystal ball said (WR) Steve Smith would
generate 228 Fantasy Points by gaining 1,500 yards receiving and scoring 13 TDs
this season. In addition, the crystal ball said (WR) Keyshawn Johnson would generate 125 Fantasy Points (via 950 yards receiving and 5 TDs).
Smith's TD and Yardage numbers basically double Johnson's. Given that, is Steve
Smith worth about twice as much as Keyshawn? Of course not, he's worth
more!!!
Hummm... So what do projected stats
really tell us about relative Fantasy worth?
As it turns outs, for most leagues, TVS analysis shows
Smith's worth is easily more than double that of Keyshawn's.
Intuitively, this makes good sense. Everything else being equal, whom would you
rather have on your roster – Steve Smith (taking up one roster spot) or
Keyshawn Johnson and Samie Parker (taking up two roster spots)? Easy Call --- grab
Smith!
For Fantasy, Smith is worth more than Parker and Johnson – in other words,
Steve Smith is worth more than two second tier Fantasy options. Perhaps you already
realized this at a gut level. That’s great. But now, TVS gives you a way to
quantify the result and precisely operationalize it into your drafting! In
addition, TVS allows you to objectively and consistently examine situations that
aren’t as obvious.
As it turns
out, heading into the 2007 season, 4for4.com’s early TVS analysis shows Smith is actually worth
more than 10 times that of Keyshawn.
Where did that ratio come from?
Good question! However, if math isn't your cup of tea, you may not enjoy the
answer. What follows in the next few paragraphs is not casual reading. Hang in.
After the math, we’ll turn back to English. Okay, you’ve been warned.
Before the TVS calculation is performed, several key metrics must be available.
You’ll need Individual Player Power Ratings. In addition, you’ll need to
compute how many Fantasy starts the Nth best player at a position will typically
provide you during the season.
Individual Power Ratings
are computed for each NFL player. At a minimum, Individual Player Power Ratings
can be computed using Projected Player Stats. But, to go beyond that, a good
power rating should consider more. For example, the 4for4.com Individual Player
Power Rating is derived from a number of variables including a player's
durability, consistency, job security, past performance, estimated future
workload and his projected statistics.
To determine how many
starts the Nth best player will typically provide, one must go back and examine
a number of prior drafts and week-to-week starting lineups. From this, you need
to form normative data. For example, the NFL’s #1 Fantasy WR typically gets
15.95 Fantasy starts per year. The 35th best WR typically makes 8.0
Fantasy starts per year. This process is continued for all positions and goes as
deep as your league’s starting lineup dictates.
With Individual Power
Ratings and Typical Start data in hand, it’s time to compute a Player’s TVS
Power Rating.
For NFL Player(I), playing
Position(J), the TVS Power Rating is computed as follows:
|
Player’s
TVS Rating =
100/(number of NFL players per Fantasy Team) x [Estimated # of Fantasy
Starts for NFL Player(I) x (1+ NFL Player(I)'s Individual Raw Power
Rating – Position(J)'s Bench Mark Power Rating)] / Average(Individual
Raw Power Rating among likely drafted players)
|
The above formula makes
use of benchmark values. These benchmarks act as a guidepost to facilitate
player comparisons within a position. The benchmark value is strategically
selected. For each position, the benchmark gets its value from several of the
best players not likely to be drafted (using their Individual Power Rating).
This choice is strategic because it measures scoring power relative to a top
prospect that's readily available via your league's free agent pool.
While the formula may look incredibly complex to some and rather basic to
others, the collective result satisfies a number of important conditions (see
Table III).
|
Table
III: The Beauty of the TVS Formula...
It satisfies the following conditions:
|
|
I) Proportionally rewards players for outscoring your competitor's players
at that position.
|
|
II) Proportionally rewards players for distancing
themselves from peer players found in the "free agent pool."
|
|
III) Rewards players in proportion to how many Fantasy
starts they'll likely provide you during the season.
|
TVS is computed for all NFL
players likely to get drafted. The calculation favors NFL players that greatly
distance themselves from other drafted players at that position.
The TVS Rating also considers the magnitude by which a drafted player distances
himself from his peers available on the waiver wire.
In addition, the TVS formula leverages historical norms and estimates the number
of Fantasy Starts a player with a given Fantasy value will typically offer you.
Bottom Line? The more
often a player can effectively start and help you win, the higher his TVS
Rating.
Excluding
extremes, while the number of draftable players varies from league to league,
this does not significantly impact the TVS Rating because it's a
relative-comparison measure. Likewise, the number of starters allowed per league
varies. Again, since this is a relative calculation, this does not greatly skew
TVS values.
For some, the TVS approach to player evaluation is new. As such, take some time
to think about the underlying principles herein. It’s a step up from basic
drafting methods.
Please don't disregard
the concepts because it's not what you've done in the past or because they sound
complex. Keep an open mind. If you do, I'm confident you'll see the benefits and
gain a competitive advantage.
The Power and
Pitfalls of Projected Yearly Data
Statistician’s talk about “expected” value. Flip a
fair coin 10,000,000 times and you'd expect to get 50% heads and 50% tails.
“Expected value” data can be invaluable in many situations. In the long run,
actual values often mirror the expected or predicted value. Good player stat
projections fall into the realm of expected value data.
Nonetheless, when it comes
down to drafting one or two key roster spots, “expected value” isn’t
always enough. Actually, this is often the case in decision support.
Time for
another example. Suppose Bill Gates stopped over to see you tonight.
During the visit he offered you two options (see Table IV).
|
Table IV: Bill Gates Stops Over For
Dinner
Option
#1 -- Gates
will flip a fair coin and you call it. If you get it right, he’ll gladly
write you a check for $5,000,000. But, if you get it wrong, you get
nothing.
Option
#2 – No
coins, no games, Bill will simply give you a check for $2,000,000.
|
Which would you take? Option #1 or Option #2?
Easy --- Option #2 all the way!
But, the “expected value” from Option #1 is actually higher than Option #2
(5,000,000 x .50 = 2,500,000 > 2,000,000).
As you can see, in some
cases, expected value neglects to factor in “utility” --- your specific
goals and how you make tradeoffs.
The same is often true when making Fantasy roster decisions. When you use
projected stats, be sure to consider other factors.
For example you wouldn’t want to draft a team with three injury-riddled RBs,
just because they had the highest projected stats at the time. In this case, the
risk does not match the reward. If several of the high-risk RBs fall to injury,
your team might never recover!
Why Using General Consensus Rankings is a Bad Idea
Should you use a General
Consensus draft list? Is it a safe bet? Does using a consensus cheat sheet help
or will it destroy your draft?
Ask a few football buddies
for their fantasy rankings this year. Next, combine that feedback with rankings
from a handful of Fantasy Football sources. Average it all out and chances are
you’ll have a reasonable ‘General Consensus’ ranking list.
But, is it a good idea to
use a consensus list? Does an average taken from 10-15 individuals result in
truth? More importantly, will General Consensus information give you an edge
over your competition?
If you’re not really
sure how to answer, don’t worry! A distressingly high proportion of Fantasy
Football owners, many of whom spend hours each week working on their team,
don’t know either!
The good news is reliable
answers exist. How? By pooling years of prior expert opinion rankings, 4for4.com
has tracked ‘General Consensus’ forecasting accuracy. From this rather
basic, but well suited research, we offer the following observations.
Consensus
cheat sheets actually do okay. In short, they can keep you out of trouble,
especially if you are new to Fantasy Football. If you don’t want to embarrass
yourself on draft day, you can feel reasonably safe using an up-to-date
consensus cheat sheet. In fact, if you just want to ‘try your luck’ this
year at Fantasy Football, feel free to use a consensus list. Who knows, you
might get lucky!
The fact is, a consensus
cheat sheet will forecast better than 60-70% of the experts making up the panel.
That’s not all that bad. However, by definition, consensus cheat sheets, do not offer the serious Fantasy Football owner a sustainable and
true competitive advantage. The good news is most Fantasy Owners don’t realize
this about Consensus Cheat Sheets. As a result, many still use General Consensus
rankings.
When you break the mold of traditional thinking and learn to outperform those
mediocre General Consensus averages, an interesting phenomenon occurs! It turns
out, the more of your foes that use average rankings, the bigger your advantage
becomes! Let’s look at an
exaggerated example to illustrate this point.
Example: Imagine you’re in a league with 10 competent veteran
Fantasy Football owners. Further, let’s assume all of the other 9 cagey
owners, independently and unknowingly, all set out on a mission to create the
ultimate consensus cheat sheet. They pool as many expert rankings as they can
find. The result? All of your rivals end up drawing from the same 15-20 sources.
They all end up using General Consensus rankings.
What are the chances that any one of those General Consensus owners will walk
away with an exceptional draft? Sorry to say, but for them, the odds are not
very good --- everyone is fundamentally drawing from the same lot. In this
situation, the General Consensus owner’s odds of acing the draft largely are a
function of random events outside of his control. Hoping you get lucky
isn’t how you should manage a team!
Alternatively, if you’re the only one using a leading-edge cheat sheet, your
chances of dominating the draft are very good.
I suggest you use General
Consensus data only as a guide to help you determine what your competition may
be thinking. In looking ahead, General Consensus information may help you
anticipate what other owners may do. But, unless you’re happy with a
middle-of-the-road showing, you’ll want to avoid drafting from a General
Consensus Cheat Sheet.
Bottom line? The most important element in Fantasy Drafting is leveraging
leading-edge player evaluations. You won’t find leading-edge information in a
diluted General Consensus list. Folks, don’t settle for group rankings and
watered down averages!
Drafting a Bargain, Just in Time
Do you think Clinton Portis is a good pick this
year? Regardless of your answer, I think I might be able to
change your mind.
If you answered no: What if I told you I picked Portis in the 12th round
of my draft last night? Would that have been a good pick? Darn right. Getting a
healthy Clinton Portis in the 12th round certainly constitutes a great pick!
If you answered yes: What if I told you I selected Portis with the 1st
overall selection? Was that a good pick? Hardly.
The point is clear. Regardless of how optimistic or pessimistic you are about an
NFL starter, at some point in a draft, that player becomes a decent pick --- a
bargain! At the right price, all viable NFL starters have Fantasy value.
The goal is to draft a
highly targeted and valued Fantasy starter just in time (as late as possible,
but always before a competitor beats you to the punch).
Top player lists, cheat
sheets and other tools can certainly help on draft day. But, to really land a
bargain, you’ll need to integrate leading-edge rankings with Average Draft
Position (ADP) data. The idea here is simple. You want to find the biggest
positive difference between the ADP data and the leading-edge ranking.
|
Value
=
Avg. Draft Position Ranking –
Quality Ranking (not general consensus rankings)
|
A positive difference
implies the player is undervalued. A negative difference suggests the player is
overvalued. By integrating leading edge rankings with ADP data, you combine
player potential with competitive analysis.
During a draft, so few people actually leverage leading-edge rankings and
anticipated draft position. Yet, you really need both elements to
walk away a big winner on draft day.
To pull this all together... check out the
4for4.com Ultimate Cheat Sheets.
I suggest you sort the Ultimate Cheat Sheets on ADP (Average Draft Position).
You'll see exactly when players are typically getting drafted and you'll see
how much of a bargain they appear to be (4for4 Rank - General Consensus Rank). Very
exciting stuff here.
Terrell Owens Case Study
Terrell Owens can be one of the best receivers in the NFL. Few would argue this
point. Owens has always been a fairly high ranked player. In fact, one year (the 2002
season), TVS analysis ranked Owens as the 4th Most Valuable Fantasy Player in the
NFL --- an amazing accomplishment for a wide receiver.
However, Owens 4th place rating in 2002 didn’t necessarily suggest you draft him forth
(or even late in the first round) that year.
Why? Because ADP data showed Owens was typically going in the 2nd round. So,
despite his real value, you would be overspending if you grabbed him with one of
the first four picks. If you were drafting late in the first round, rather than
selecting Owens with your first pick, you might have been able to land another
stud in round one and still grab Owens early in the 2nd round.
Passing up a high rated player is risky, but with the risk, comes the potential
for even greater rewards. In the above example, if you landed a top-tier RB in
round one and Owens in round two, you would have been well on your way.
We all have different risk tolerance --- only you can determine how much risk is
right for you and your situation.
Putting together a well-designed draft strategy, having a backup plan,
anticipating your competitor's moves and identifying bargains in each round is a
lot of work. But, if you really want to win, it's essential.
To help you make this happen, see the 4for4.com Ultimate Cheat
Sheets.
In a nutshell, you want to avoid using a General Consensus
list. Rather, use a leading-edge source. Next, you want to draft highly ranked
players just before they're selected by one of your opponents.
In the process, you’ll want to target and draft players that give you
valuable starts -- a starting lineup that will consistently outscore your
opponent’s starters.
Do-Don’t
Report - Landing Bargains, Avoiding the Overspend
One of the simplest yet most effective reports to have by
your side on draft day is a Do(s) and Don’t(s) report.
To
create this report, you integrate proven leading edge rankings with Average
Draft Position data.
Sort the
players by Average Draft Position and subtract the leading-edge rankings. If you
find a big positive difference, you found a bargain. Next, note the round the
player is typically drafted in. Then, go to that round and denote it in your
Do(s) and Don’t(s) report.
Likewise
if you find a huge negative score, you’ll want to denote that as well. This
indicates the player is over-valued for that given round. Denote that to avoid
overspending!
Each year, 4for4.com crafts a Do(s) and Don’t(s) report and publishes it
online. Despite it’s rather simple appearance, the report integrated projected
stats, TVS values and competitive analysis into a very readable format. See
Table V for a sample report.
If you want leading-edge rankings, would like to select highly ranked
players just before they're selected by one of your opponents and target/draft
players that yield you a starting lineup that will consistently outscore your
opponent’s starters, check out Table V.
Regardless of if you use 4for4.com’s Do(s) and Don’t(s) report or make your
own, you’ll have an edge over the guy or gal next to you come draft day!
|
Table V:
Example of 4for4.com’s
Do(s) and Don't(s) Report
This unique and powerful Cheat Sheet
companion goes beyond the basics. This format integrates player potential and average draft
position data. Delivered in a very readable round-by-round format, this
report displays bargains and keeps you from overspending. By having this
type report by your side, you’ll integrate a number of factors outlined
in this article. No panic drafting, no falling back on your gut, no
unsettling “thinking on the fly” --- rather you’re in complete control,
leveraging all the essentials.
|
|
6th
Round
|
|
Don't eagerly draft TONY GONZALEZ before the 6th Round
|
|
All things being equal, don't draft MARC BULGER before the 6th Round
|
|
Don't eagerly draft JOE HORN before the 6th Round
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
9th
Round
|
|
If
he's available, do consider drafting TERRY GLENN in the 9th Round
|
|