Should I do both of these trades, one, or none? If so, which and why?
Me - CJ Anderson, Blount, Steve Smith
Trader - Bell, Charles Johnson
and/or
Me - A. Foster, Allen Robinson
Trader - Latavius Murray, Martavis Bryant
Here's my team, if you need it:
Ryan Tannehill Mia - QB
Demaryius Thomas Den - WR
Randall Cobb GB - WR
C.J. Anderson Den - RB
Frank Gore Ind - RB
Greg Olsen Car - TE
Jonathan Stewart Car - RB
Arian Foster Hou - RB
Jarvis Landry Mia - WR
LeGarrette Blount NE - RB
Allen Robinson Jax - WR
Steve Smith Sr. Bal - WR
Tevin Coleman Atl - RB
Marques Colston NO - WR
Isaiah Crowell Cle - RB
As you can see, I need a DEF and K -- Which two should I drop? Or Colston and ______?
THANK YOU!
I'm not a big fan of doing trades before the season starts unless I feel I'm, or the subscriber, is getting a huge payback. In either case, it's kind of close.
I MAY be tempted to do the first one just because you're getting Bell back. I think with Gore, Foster and Stewart you can live with this type of two RBs for one kind of deal and you can survive Bell's suspension as well because you have real nice depth at the position. It's tough to trust all three of those RBs for various reasons, but either should be carry the load type backs. With Bell, you're getting the best player in the deal so I could convince myself to do that one.
Maybe before the suspension I would have told you to do both, but Bryant worries me and I may have drafted him in every draft I've done to this point. I'm also not sold on Raiders so that deal is a little worrisome.
I actually like Colston a little but give the rest of your roster I guess it would be him and Crowell. Although I guess if you would do the Bell trade you'd only have to drop one player?
