|
Drafting Principles
and Tactics In this article,
I will cover: Targeting Valuable
Starters Unlike other popular drafting
methods, TVS fully integrates five vital elements and delivers the results via a
parsimonious Power Rating. Player's Fantasy Worth = (# Fantasy Starts) x
(Relative Scoring Ability) Strictly
speaking, a good Fantasy Draft consists of more than just obtaining a number of
high scoring studs. Rather, a good draft allows you to field an outstanding starting
lineup week-in and week-out. In addition, a successful Fantasy Draft must
yield a starting lineup that will consistently outscore your opponent's starting
lineup.
The take is simple! The
better job you can do at targeting and drafting valuable starters, the better
your draft. TVS helps you do just this. Before we get into more
specifics on TVS, it's time for another example. Where did that 10x ratio come from?
Good question! However, if math isn't your cup of tea, you may not enjoy the
answer. What follows in the next few paragraphs is not casual reading. Hang in.
After the math, we'll turn back to English. Okay, you've been warned. Individual Power Ratings
are computed for each NFL player. At a minimum, Individual Player Power Ratings
can be computed using Projected Player Stats. But, to go beyond that, a good
power rating should consider more. For example, the 4for4.com Individual Player
Power Rating is derived from a number of variables including a player's
durability, consistency, job security, past performance, estimated future
workload and his projected statistics. To determine how many
starts the Nth best player will typically provide, one must go back and examine
a number of prior drafts and week-to-week starting lineups. From this, you need
to form normative data. For example, the NFL's #1 Fantasy WR typically gets
15.95 Fantasy starts per year. The 35th best WR typically makes 8.0
Fantasy starts per year. This process is continued for all positions and goes as
deep as your league's starting lineup dictates. With Individual Power
Ratings and Typical Start data in hand, it's time to compute a Player's TVS
Power Rating. For NFL Player(I), playing Position(J), the TVS Power Rating is computed as follows:
The above formula makes
use of benchmark values. These benchmarks act as a guidepost to facilitate
player comparisons within a position. The benchmark value is strategically
selected. For each position, the benchmark gets its value from several of the
best players not likely to be drafted (using their Individual Power Rating).
This choice is strategic because it measures scoring power relative to a top
prospect that's readily available via your league's free agent pool.
Bottom Line? The more
often a player can effectively start and help you win, the higher his TVS
Rating.
For some, the TVS approach to player evaluation is new. As such, take some time
to think about the underlying principles herein. It's a step up from basic
drafting methods. Nonetheless, when it comes
down to drafting one or two key roster spots, 'expected value' isn't
always enough. Actually, this is often the case in decision support. Time for
another example. Suppose Bill Gates stopped over to see you tonight.
During the visit he offered you two options (see Table IV).
As you can see, in some
cases, expected value neglects to factor in 'utility' --- your specific
goals and how you make tradeoffs. Why Using General Consensus Rankings is
often times a Bad Idea Ask a few football buddies
for their fantasy rankings this year. Next, combine that feedback with rankings
from a handful of Fantasy Football sources. Average it all out and chances are
you'll have a reasonable 'General Consensus' ranking list. But, is it a good idea to
use a consensus list? Does an average taken from 10-15 individuals result in
truth? More importantly, will General Consensus information give you an edge
over your competition? If you're not really
sure how to answer, don't worry! A distressingly high proportion of Fantasy
Football owners, many of whom spend hours each week working on their team,
don't know either! The good news is reliable
answers exist. How? By pooling years of prior expert opinion rankings, 4for4.com
has tracked 'General Consensus' forecasting accuracy. From this rather
basic, but well suited research, we offer the following observations. Consensus
cheat sheets actually do okay. In short, they can keep you out of trouble,
especially if you are new to Fantasy Football. If you don't want to embarrass
yourself on draft day, you can feel reasonably safe using an up-to-date
consensus cheat sheet. In fact, if you just want to 'try your luck' this
year at Fantasy Football, feel free to use a consensus list. Who knows, you
might get lucky! The fact is, a consensus
cheat sheet will forecast better than 60-70% of the experts making up the panel.
That's not all that bad. However, by definition, consensus cheat sheets, do not offer the serious Fantasy Football owner a sustainable and
true competitive advantage. The good news is most Fantasy Owners don't realize
this about Consensus Cheat Sheets. As a result, many still use General Consensus
rankings. Example: Imagine you're in a league with 10 competent veteran
Fantasy Football owners. Further, let's assume all of the other 9 cagey
owners, independently and unknowingly, all set out on a mission to create the
ultimate consensus cheat sheet. They pool as many expert rankings as they can
find. The result? All of your rivals end up drawing from the same 15-20 sources.
They all end up using General Consensus rankings. The goal is to draft a
highly targeted and valued Fantasy starter just in time (as late as possible,
but always before a competitor beats you to the punch). Top player lists, cheat sheets and other tools can certainly help on draft day. But, to really land a bargain, you'll need to integrate leading-edge rankings with Average Draft Position (ADP) data. The idea here is simple. You want to find the biggest positive difference between the ADP data and the leading-edge ranking.
A positive difference
implies the player is undervalued. A negative difference suggests the player is
overvalued. By integrating leading edge rankings with ADP data, you combine
player potential with competitive analysis. In a nutshell, you want to avoid using a General Consensus list. Rather, use a leading-edge source. Next, you want to draft highly ranked players just before they're selected by one of your opponents. In the process, you'll want to target and draft players that give you valuable starts -- a starting lineup that will consistently outscore your opponent's starters. To
create this report, you integrate proven leading edge rankings with Average
Draft Position data.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Sign up now to receive hot fantasy news, analysis, and insights delivered FREE to your inbox.

